
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by joanro on 28 June 2012 - 18:06

by Keith Grossman on 28 June 2012 - 18:06
Really? Let's explore that; shall we? Do you have children? If you do, do you take a deduction for them off of your taxes? If so, then yes, I do in fact pay for resources that you use. Every person uses x amount of resources. If you and I made the same amount of money but I pay more taxes because I have no dependents, I am paying more while using fewer public resources while you are paying less and using more, ergo, I am subsdizing you.
"Are you referring to southerners as 'You people'?"
I am referring to you right-wing zealots who spew your rhetoric without even knowing what you're talking about. The only people who will have to pay under the individual mandate are people who can afford to purchase insurance but choose not to. If you'd rather forego buying insurance so that you can drive a Cadillac instead of a Chevy, you get to pay and you deserve to because while I am not opposed to helping those who really need it, paying for the health care costs for people like that does sort of gripe my ass and it should yours as well.

by Keith Grossman on 28 June 2012 - 18:06
They didn't until the Republicans put the change into the law. So why aren't you pissed off about having to insure your car?

by Keith Grossman on 28 June 2012 - 19:06
Good post, Blitzen; too bad the OP never made it past this sentence.
by joanro on 28 June 2012 - 19:06

by GSD Admin on 28 June 2012 - 19:06

by Keith Grossman on 28 June 2012 - 19:06
"Car insurance, in case you weren't aware, is not federally mandated, it is state mandated, as it should be."
How is the state mandating you buy a product from a private company fundamentally different from the federal government requiring you do so? You people just like to bitch and you have no idea what's even in the law you're bitching about.
And by the way, the Carolinas get more federal money than the federal government collects from them in income taxes so on some level, yeah, you are somewhat subsidized whether you want to believe it or not.

by Keith Grossman on 28 June 2012 - 19:06
I'm guessing he's not going to be on the invite list for Christmas dinner at the Scalia house this year.
by joanro on 28 June 2012 - 19:06

by Keith Grossman on 28 June 2012 - 20:06
Really? And which states don't mandate automobile insurance? Oh, that's right...none! Sort of a moot issue; isn't it?
And you can get away from federal mandates...move to another country.
"Wrong again, Kieth, you don't subsidize me even IF the Carolinas 'get more federal money'. I don't receive anything from the state, but I do pay school taxes even tho I don't have kids, and I pay taxes for use of roads, convenient center, etc. sorry, but I live my life without your subsidies."
Not very good at math or logic are you. The federal government contributes to infrastructure projects in your and every other state in the country...infrastructure that you use.
"And the Carolinas wouldn't need more federal money than is collected in taxes if the FEDERAL government had not sent all their jobs to other countries."
Really? The federal government shipped these jobs overseas? How is that possible if they're not the ones who create jobs in the first place? Bain Capital, under Romney's direction, was responsible for shipping a lot of American jobs overseas. Maybe that's what you're thinking of.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top