
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by GSD2727 on 19 December 2011 - 20:12
And I am sorry that you lost your girl and had to go through this with her :( I am sure it was very heartbreaking!
I am not familiar with your situation or this breeder other than what is posted on this thread. Was Megan the only puppy produced with epilepsy? And everyone thinks that the parents should not be bred again (even to other dogs?) because of one situation?
IMO if a litter produced ONE dog with a disease (the other littermates healthy), I do not necessarily think neither parent should never be bred again. I may not repeat the breeding of the same parents together, but if the mother is bred to a different male the results may be very different. If we threw every dog out of the gene pool who has a relative with a health issue or who produced one puppy with a health issue we would have no more dogs to breed!
Now if there are several puppies being produced with epilepsy by the same dog, that is different. And obviously the breeder should be honest about what is produced and not hide the fact. And of course a dog WITH epilepsy should never be bred!
by Wildmoor on 19 December 2011 - 21:12
As with other complex, possibly polygenic disorders in which the genetic basis is not clearly understood, the best current advice is to try and decrease the incidence of this condition by undertaking depth and breadth pedigree analysis (that is, checking for records of incidence of the disease in ancestors and relatives) prior to breeding (Patterson 2007, Bell 2010) and breeding only from individuals with the most healthy pedigree analysis. As Bell (2010) suggested: “individuals whose siblings are normal, and whose parents' siblings are normal have the greatest chance of carrying a low genetic load for the condition”. Patterson (2007) recommended that no individuals with affected ancestors should be bred from, nor those with more than 25% of siblings affected. He also recommended that individuals should be at least 5 years of age before being used for breeding so that it is unlikely they are affected by IE themselves.
Bell JS (2010) Genetic Testing and Genetic Counseling in Pet and Breeding Dogs. World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings
Patterson E (2007) Clinical Characteristics and Inheritance of Idiopathic Epilepsy. Tufts' Canine and Feline Breeding and Genetics Conference, 2007. Available from - VIN. Associate

by Abby Normal on 19 December 2011 - 23:12
Some diseases are more significant than others and epilepsy IMO is very high on that list.
by GSD2727 on 20 December 2011 - 00:12
I am NOT talking about these dogs in particular, as I already said I dont think they should be bred anyways based on the pedigree alone.
But in general, we need to do our best to breed away from health issues... Dont get me wrong, I am not saying we should breed a dog who has epilepsy! or a dog who has health issues. I am just saying if a dog is bred and produces ONE puppy out of a litter of 8 with a health issue, I do not necessarily agree that this dog should immediately be removed from the gene pool. IMO there are a lot of other things to consider too!
by Wildmoor on 20 December 2011 - 01:12
What if that dog produces 1 affected progeny in several litters would you still state not to remove ?, if there are affected how many are carriers! how many owners of progeny in that/or other litters have not informed the breeder of problems due to fear of backlash or being blamed.
If pedigree analysis is comprehensive across the breed, “breeding values” can be assigned, allowing comparison of the genetic merit of individuals within the breed. Assigning and using breeding values in this way has decreased the incidence of IE in the Belgian Tervuren breedI can not understand why in a country as large as the US have only 31 GSDs had their DNA sent to researchers for genetic research into epilepsy, out of those 31, 16 were affected
Why such a small amount? do people not want to protect the breeds future.
Ostrich syndrome!
by GSD John on 20 December 2011 - 10:12
Continuing to bury your head and problems in the sand will only insure that there will be no clear lines for the future.
What has happened cannot be undone but that does not mean we should accept the status quo as a normal and unpleasant part of the breed, there are things we can do, which have been mentioned above.
As pet owners we take these tests very seriously and have participated in many research programmes. doing nothing when one isolated pup is produced with a health issue is what has us in a situation today where "there is not a line today that will not have a problem dog somewhere in the line".
Margaret
by GSD2727 on 20 December 2011 - 19:12
I think we are more in agreement than disagreement. Again, I am sorry that you have had to go through this with your dog Megan :(
Can you tell me, is there a test for epilepsy? Like for breeding animals? Also, being that I am not real familiar with it, can you point me towards any information that tells how it is inherited? Always interested in learning.
Thanks for your info!
Valerie
by Wildmoor on 20 December 2011 - 21:12
Valerie
The mode of inheritance in the GSD is not currently known, there is no test for the GSD
Researchers require more dNA from not only affected dogs but sibblings etc and of none affected dogs over the age of 7 years, plus funding.
as you are in the US please contribute at least DNA from your GSDs
http://www.canine-epilepsy.net/cerc.html

by Abby Normal on 20 December 2011 - 23:12
Wildmoor and Margaret have answered your question better than I could.
by GSD2727 on 21 December 2011 - 02:12
But I will check out the page further. Thanks for the info!
Valerie
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top