
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by rottguy1980 on 02 August 2010 - 16:08
Keep up the good work!

by Sunsilver on 02 August 2010 - 17:08
The giant panda is classified as belonging to the order Carnivora, yet it is almost completely herbivorous! Bears are also classed as carnivores, yet they will eat just about anything.

by uvw on 02 August 2010 - 18:08
lol, let me rephrase...a dog has the digestive tract of a carnivore. so unless there is a lack of meat, that is what they should be fed.
cows are herbivores, but our food industry likes to feed them corn, rice hulls, grain by-products, and chicken poop (no need to separate chicken poop from the sawdust on the barn floor either). cows are still alive, right? we still have meat, correct? but they also have diseases, need to be shot up with antibiotics and hormones, and they produce meat that is waaay overloaded on omega 6 with almost no omega 3. there are also e-coli recalls on our meats because of this. it's no wonder why everyone in this country has declining health.
but it's OK...because the Association Of American Feed Control Officials says chicken poop in cow feed meets the minimal requirements for nutrition.
lol
by hexe on 02 August 2010 - 19:08
OMG, uvw, I only wish you'd posted this information sooner--I just lost one of my girls in February, and now I see it must have been because I fed her commercial dog food! If only I'd known I was killing my dog! <sob>
Oh, wait--she was a 14 1/2 year old GSD who'd eaten Iams MiniChunks since she was 9 weeks of age, and never had any long term skin problems, ear problems, coat issues, chronic digestive tract ailments, food sensitivities, major medical conditions or weight issues...so maybe the food she'd eaten for the majority of her lifetime played no role whatsoever in her body finally failing her. In fact, maybe the food she'd eaten for all that time helped her enjoy a basically healthy, fully active life right up to the point where her body failed her and she couldn't rise and stand, even with help. My other old girl will be 15 in October, and she's been on the same feeding program since she was 8 months old (got her as a rescue...before that, she was fed whatever she could catch while on a chain, and every so often the person who chained her would give her some cheap dog food or household scraps if he thought of it)...so the commercial feed seems to be working out for her as well.
The whole raw/commercial feed debate is such bullshit. Neither is the ONLY way to feed a dog, and neither is the right choice for every dog. The percentage of raw-fed dogs that have died of cancers--both in advanced years and in the middle of the normal lifespan for the breeds--or had skin and ear problems, GI problems, food sensitivities, major medical conditions and weight issues does not differ significantly from that of dogs fed commercially produced dog foods. I'd warrant that environmental exposure to the variety of toxins, both those already recognized and those yet to be identified, is the major player in the health issues seen in our pets (as well as ourselves). Add to this the perpetuation of the genetics of dogs which require special diets that are grain-free or have limited protein and/or carbohydrate sources in order to thrive, and we end up with animals that could not survive if they were fed as their wild canid cousins truly live...as opportunistic scavengers who occassionally get lucky and make a fresh kill, similar to feral and wild swine, moreso than true carnivorous predators like the cat family which MUST have unspoiled animal/avian/fish protein to survive.
If someone wants to feed raw, I won't argue with them or tell them they're going to kill their dog. I will caution them to research the diet they're selecting carefully to ensure that it provides all of the necessary nutrients, and make sure they're aware of the clinical signs of intestinal obstruction and perforation if they're feeding bones (raw or cooked) just to be on the safe side. Beyond that, if it works for the owner and it works for the dog, then I've got no issues with it.
Ditto for feeding commercially-prepared dog foods, with or without grains or cereals. If the dog thrives on it, and it works for the owner, then there's nothing broken and therefor there's nothing that needs fixing.
"Doom Nuggets" indeed. Pfft.

by uvw on 02 August 2010 - 22:08
could you please let everyone know what study this information came from? to my knowledge, there has not been such a study conducted.
there are many dogs that can survive without problems while eating garbage. just like there are many chain smokers that can live well into their 80’s and 90’s without cancers. that doesn’t mean i’m going to chance it and light up a smoke.
if you prefer feeding processed food to your two dogs, and have had success doing so, god bless you and good luck with your future dogs as well. there are many people that haven’t had that sort of luck, which is why vet clinics are popping up on every corner nowadays. after all, processed foods can be linked to many degenerative diseases. why would the effect of processed foods on dogs and cats be any different than on humans?
you can also look into self funded, unbiased studies conducted by Dr. Francis Pottenger; interesting information, not swayed by big business.
oh, did you have a problem with your iams mini chunks in 2007? i believe it was making dogs very ill, many of which died.
iams, as well as other p&g foods, have recently been recalled as well. just something to look into: recall.
environmental exposure, toxins, and vaccines that vets push on our animals are all to blame. and processed foods should not be excluded from that group.
some people are satisfied with mediocrity, but others are trying to inform the general public that there are other options when it comes to feeding your animals. if you’re ok with the way things are, that’s perfectly fine, but you shouldn’t discourage others from trying to educate, or learn about how to improve standards, health, and the quality of life.

by Sunsilver on 03 August 2010 - 12:08
You want to feed raw, GREAT! I just wish your vet would call you up the next time he has to operate to disempact a dog with obstipation from eating too much bone, or a punctured bowel from a bone splinter. It DOES happen.
I choose to feed kibble, NOT just because of fear of harmful bacteria, but for the convenience. I don't want to have to mess around trying to balance a raw diet. And I know enough about nutrition to know I'd be risking my dogs' health if I got it wrong (see above about the ocelot with rickets.)
I also travel with my dogs during the summer, and don't want to have to lug raw food around with me and risk it spoiling. Kibble is far more convenient. I have spent many hours reading the labels on dog food bags to make sure the kibble I feed is high quality. My dogs are healthy, happy and have shiny coats. My previous GSD lived to 14 1/2, and rarely saw the vet, except for injuries, so I must be doing SOMETHING right!
Oh, wait. She did have one trip to the vet that was due to diet. She got into the neighbour's garbage!

by rottguy1980 on 03 August 2010 - 15:08

by Sunsilver on 03 August 2010 - 15:08
There is more than one way to feed our dogs, and calling kibble 'Cereal Killer' is bound to annoy those of us who have fed kibble for many years with no bad effects.
Both Hexe and I find the evangelical fervor of raw feeders hard to take. I have seen firsthand that raw feeding CAN be dangerous, especially if not done properly.
I will also concede that certain kibbles are not balanced nutritionally, and sometimes they contain harmful ingredients. (Witness the melamine disaster of a couple of years ago.) As with feeding raw, you need to be informed, and make sure you are feeding a good quality food.
Let's agree to disagree on this, and move on, okay? I just wanted to show there is another side to the 'Raw is the best thing EVER!' gospel.
BTW, the only post on here that's a personal attack is YOURS. Thank you for dragging this thread down the toilet!

by rottguy1980 on 03 August 2010 - 15:08

by uvw on 03 August 2010 - 16:08
what i did was post an article (that you personally don't agree with) to inform people of another option that's out there for feeding their dogs and cats, as well as some of the harms of kibble, and those people can then do some research and make up their own minds. i still have faith that people will revert to common sense when they see everything that has been shoved down their throats by the pet industry isn’t helping.
you may have a degree in biology, but how many years experience do you have with raw feeding? how many dogs experience do you have with raw feeding?
my vet now acknowledges raw feeding as a plausible option...which is a huge step in the right direction, to improving the general health of our animals.
do you work with any vets that refer problem clients to you to get them nutritionally on track before treating and medicating them for something that could be avoided?
you said: “As for vets, I have made an effort to educate my vet about what crap the foods he pushes are, such as Science Diet which is mainly made from corn and other grains; but he will not listen, so I know the problems with the veterinary profession.”
it doesn’t take a biologist to convince someone that science diet is sub par.
by the way, my vet would call me if there were any surgeries being done due to raw bones. it is now august, there have been none. but there have been several surgeries to retrieve socks, bedding, and toys. maybe there should be a new anti-sock movement to save our dogs from that danger?
as i said before, in your own words, you feed kibble for fear of bacteria and for its convenience. i, among many others, prefer not to conveniently kill my dogs slowly.
reading ingredient labels does not take much effort, anyone can do that right from their computer screen, it doesn’t take a biologist to do that either. researching raw feeding, buying, packing, freezing food, and wiping down the kitchen counter and floor does. for some people that is too much effort, for others that effort saves them lots of money and heartache long term. you may have spent many hours reading ingredient labels, but i have spent many years hands on raw feeding from both the feeding and manufacturing sides. are you really that naive to think the dog food company is required to list ALL of the ingredients, preservatives, chemicals? do you think the meat that goes into making dog food is not already spoiled?
as for traveling, i travel myself, to canada and cross country. it’s amazing how much frozen food a small $12 igloo cooler can hold, and how long the food stays frozen (if you’re driving of course). otherwise, it’s just as easy to stop at a supermarket or butcher when you get to your destination, or bring freeze dried food with you if you don’t want to make additional stops.
again, many dogs live long seemingly healthy lives on garbage food, laying in pesticide ridden grass, and being shot up with vaccines all their lives. but many dogs have to be put down at the age of 4, 5, 6, from full blown cancer as well.
14.5 years is great, have all your dogs lived that long? if feeding kibble works for you, god bless you as well, and i wish you and all your future dogs the same luck.
ps - my tone was never condescending, you are just annoyed because my views are not in line with yours.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top