
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Mackenzie on 17 February 2010 - 10:02
"That means looking for the all-round working dog with correct balanced conformation, that allows it to do the job it was bred to do".
To Petowner, I am referring to the animals that fit as close as possible to the international standard as set out by the SV and WUSV. I agree that there are extremes within this framework. In my opinion this is partly caused by the limited breeding material available to breeders. It is only in more recent times that, for example, the UK breeders have been able to wider this field following changes to the quarantine rules.
Mackenzie

by AmbiiGSD on 17 February 2010 - 10:02

by missbeeb on 17 February 2010 - 11:02
Noddi, I don't think you'll get any grief from anyone; there's been more than one bitch (never a dog) from the other side that I've liked over the years, but I've always doubted that they'd "breed on".
Despite there not being a "middle of the road" type... we all know what it means, probably more applicable in the early 90's when there were more extremes? Generally, "middle of the road" amounts to a correct type.
We all know Mr Brandon is wrong, we all know what he breeds blah, blah, blah... I don't like pictures or links posted for all to ridicule, that also, is wrong. jmho.
by Mackenzie on 17 February 2010 - 11:02
Kind regards
Mackenzie
by noddi on 17 February 2010 - 13:02
by peterlee on 17 February 2010 - 18:02
Ah, but do we all know that Mr Brandon is wrong? And does everyone ridicule him? It doesn’t look like that to me.
(1) Mr Brandon says he is a Kennel Club assessor for first time CC judges.
(2) He says he judges all breeds at Open Show level and is on various Club lists for other Working/Pastoral breeds.
(3) More breed Champions seem to have been produced by the Lornaville kennel than you can shake a stick at (I do, incidentally, use the words ‘says’ and ‘seem’ not because I don’t believe him but because it is simpler to take a person at his own word than enter into sterile debate about whether this or that fact is correct).
As Dr Willis says, ‘The “Alsatian” which is recognized here and virtually no where else, appears to be supported and lauded by the Kennel Club.’ What are the above if not evidence of that? Mr Brandon and Lornaville ‘Alsatians’ are certainly not ridiculed by the Kennel Club.
And that is the point, is it not? Many people in this country want to be able to run events for the GSD (not the ‘German Shepherd Dog (‘Alsatian’)’according to WUSV rules and according to WUSV standards. Why should any club willingly put itself in the position of having to seek the ‘express permission’ of the KC to hold such an event? WUSV rules and standards are for the correct type of GSD recognized universally. Can the same be said for KC shows? And if it cannot then what is the sense in voluntarily giving the Kennel Club a veto on whether a German Shepherd can be shown under WUSV rules in this country?

by missbeeb on 17 February 2010 - 19:02
Is that what you want then... for everyone to ridicule him? I find that, at best, strange. Frankly, I don't give a damn if the KC and the Alsatianists revere the man.
I'm deliciously happy because we'll finally be "doing our own thing".
by arbeiter on 17 February 2010 - 19:02
Just ask yourself how many BREED shows has Lornaville entered let alone won.Asuming you agree that Geman Nationals who come over here to judge know what a german shepherd is meant to look like-ask yourself again how many of those judges has Mr Brandon entered under ? Surely if he and his FRIENDS thought they had the correct type they would enter all the BREED champshows.
by noddi on 17 February 2010 - 21:02

by Sue B on 17 February 2010 - 21:02
Arbeiter, I think Peterlee (albeit in a different way) was making that very point. In addition he was pointing out how the KC fail to realise that. People talk about the middle of the road but those who class themselves as middle of the road dont admire his dogs but the KC dont appear to realise that either. The KC appoint Judges Assessors based on the amount of CC's the individual has handed out, considering how long he has been judging in the breed and the fact that very few people are of his ilk when it comes to type, he will have judged more than most over the years. As Malcolm Willis also said, "The existence of two types of GSD is brought about by the Kennel Club permitting judges to award CCs when they should not even be judging the breed at all."
Missbeeb, at this crossroads of our breeds future in the UK , I tend to agree with your last statement more and more with each passing day and especially every time I read the now weekly KC press releases. The thought of not having to request a date for when we want to run a show and have to wait in line for the all breeds to be issued dates first, not having to get their approval for the judges we want to ask (especially when they are SV trained), not having to pay £35 or £70 respectively up front to run a show, not having to pay them an extra 20p for every entry we recieve at champ shows, not having to wade through every page of every KC Gazzette looking for the next rule change, not having to request special permission for special classes, be ticked off for missing something quite irrelevant out of the schedule, worry that we might have to report our judge, take esculation proceedures to suspend judgeing, report exhibitors or cancel the show, oh what bliss.
Regards
Sue
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top