
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by RatPackKing on 11 October 2010 - 17:10
Thanks B azz a.......Who is Roland though? You seem strangely familiar with memory problems......LOL!!!
Randy
Randy
by bazza on 11 October 2010 - 18:10
No Roland.......just yours, lol.

by RatPackKing on 11 October 2010 - 18:10
I can never tell high praise from mockery.

by bazza on 11 October 2010 - 18:10
Take your time, I'm sure you will come to the right conclusion.

by RatPackKing on 11 October 2010 - 18:10
You know Bazza, it’s human nature that once you get a shiny new idea, you run with it like crazy. Thoughts?
Randy
Randy

by knucles on 12 October 2010 - 01:10
sorry prager that this all went to shit. i wont post again for sure.to many pricks.thanks
by bazza on 12 October 2010 - 09:10
Roland, tell me your shiny new idea and I'll tell you if you should run like crazy with it,......best advice I can give you!
Knucles....... NEVER A TRUER WORD WAS SPOKEN!! Believe me I'm with you on that.
Knucles....... NEVER A TRUER WORD WAS SPOKEN!! Believe me I'm with you on that.
by michael49 on 12 October 2010 - 16:10
This is a perfect example of a new person seeking information and knowlege from experienced people, but instead being accused of name dropping and trying to start trouble.Even a question directed to a specific person is answered with the opinions of people that have to add their two cents.Some of you play a very active roll in discouraging new members from asking questions here.Why don't you people just keep your smart remarks and opinions to your self and let Prager decide for himself if he wants to answer Knuckles question. For all you self appointed op police that think they know everything about why this question was asked, let me say this, I know Knuckles personally and his question to Prager was an honest one, with no hidden agenda he simply wanted to learn about some dogs from someone who might have first hand knowledge of them.
Michael
Michael
by beetree on 12 October 2010 - 16:10
How silly. As evidenced by Prager's lack of participation. Knuckles could have been more specific but he choose to take his toys and go home. Wasn't all that interested in the answer to his non question, was he?
by michael49 on 12 October 2010 - 17:10
beetree, Why do you say it was a non question, do you know knuckles? You seem to assume that you know more then you actually know, as for as Hans not responding, maybe he hasn't had time or hasn't seen the post or maybe he just chooses not to answer, either way you are still assuming that you know something you don't and that you can answer for Hans.Just because the question was'nt structured in a manner that you couldn't comprehend doesn't mean it wasn't legitimate, as far as your assumption that knuckles was name dropping, if you knew much of anything, you'd know that these dogs appear in a lot of Czech pedigrees several generations back. Michael
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top