
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by LAVK-9 on 06 February 2010 - 03:02
Just wondering more about HSUS cause the org I am working with to get grant $ to train service dogs...one of the places we were going to look in to funding was HSUS. If they are so agains people having pets then why would they give $ for service dogs?
There might be certain towns that have a spay policy but that is more so no thanks to Bob Barker.Something I read a while back LA was going to have that law that ALL pets had to be neutered unless it was a compitition dog or guard etc.I think it is a bunch of crap!! Anyone that tried to touch my dogs to neuter them is going to get neutered themselves!!! I worked as a vet tech i would have no problem doing it to someone that messed with my dogs or took my rights away from me. So if that were to be the case of NO pets then I guess the Prez would have to give his PWD up and the VP would have to give up his GSD.

by LAVK-9 on 06 February 2010 - 04:02

by CrysBuck25 on 06 February 2010 - 04:02
Who ever heard of a kennel license to possess more than three animals twenty years ago? Fifty years? Seventy five years? Nope, they're new. Were there not unwanted dogs back in the day before spay and neuter, back when Fido sowed his wild oats any time he wanted, and the neighbors had puppies?
Both of my dogs are spayed, Oakley at nine weeks before I got her, and Misty at seven months of age. I didn't strongly agree with the idea, but I had no choice with one, and without a completely impenetrable fence, I wasn't taking any chances. Will I some day have a bitch or dog that I don't have fixed until physical maturity? Yes. I want, some day in the future, to have a pup to train and compete, perhaps in Schutzhund or some type of work, and I won't be told by some lackey with no brains that I can't have an unspayed dog because the law prohibits it.
There is way too much government today, way too much concern with the workings of the ordinary man, too much invasion of what is fundamentally not ANY government's business.
Groups like PETA and HSUS have no problem if their agenda takes a couple of generations to come to fruition...Haste makes waste, especially with public perception. Go slow and make sure they don't see through your spin...
Take it however you want, but it's not hard to see what the goals are...Read their websites, their mission statements, the views of their top people.
But if you decide to back them, don't ever take the "Don't Wear Animals" leather campaign to a biker rally and throw stuff at them for using/wearing leather....It won't be good.
Crys

by LAVK-9 on 06 February 2010 - 04:02
by TessJ10 on 06 February 2010 - 13:02
Simple. They do enough positive PR so people donate lots of money to them, which they then use to sponsor anti-pet, anti-agriculture, anti-hunting legislation. I've been following HSUS for many, many years. Their website and their interviews used to be quite anti-pet, but then they wised up - that doesn't bring in the cash from the animal lovers with their Foofy & Fluffy at home, does it? So they make sure they do "nice" things so people think, Oh, HSUS, they're such a great organization, and send in the cash.
"There might be certain towns that have a spay policy but that is more so no thanks to Bob Barker.Something I read a while back LA was going to have that law that ALL pets had to be neutered unless it was a compitition dog or guard etc.I think it is a bunch of crap!! Anyone that tried to touch my dogs to neuter them is going to get neutered themselves!!! I worked as a vet tech i would have no problem doing it to someone that messed with my dogs or took my rights away from me."
Then stay away from HSUS! Here's a good bookmark site: www.saova.org. They keep a good eye on anti-animal organizations that masquerade as pro-animal orgs.
The quote below is from http://saova.org/Chicago1.html Read the HSUS statement very carefully, esp. the part I bolded. The "reorientation" of what must be done with animals, YOUR animals, is their stated goal.
"On July 30, HSUS issued a press release via their website in support of the proposed mandatory spay/castrate ordinance and thanked Chicago lawmakers for “addressing this important animal welfare issue.” The statement reads, “Every year, more than 3 million dogs and cats are euthanized in animal shelters nationwide-including 19,000 pets in the City of Chicago-because not enough people choose to adopt. Spaying and neutering, at this time, is the only permanent, 100-percent effective method of birth control for dogs and cats, and this legislation provides an incentive for people to sterilize their animals and reorients public policy to expect that animal caretakers will see that their animals are sterilized.” "

by CrysBuck25 on 06 February 2010 - 17:02
Here's another sobering statistic...If all dogs and cats were sterilized, it would only take a maximum of fifteen to twenty years before there wouldn't be any dogs or cats left. No reproduction equals the end of the species...Actually very clever.
Of course, trying to get the whole world to go along with the AR, Earth worshipper freaks is going to take longer than that, but if a country like China can be changed, with its population that comprises more than one sixth of the world's population, then it can be done. Fight these creeps wherever you can, as much as you can.
Crys

by LAVK-9 on 06 February 2010 - 20:02
~L~

by CrysBuck25 on 06 February 2010 - 23:02
You ask if they've read the articles about the negative effects of sterilization on dogs...
If they want to bring about the end of several species, do you think they care about causing health problems in the implementation of their agenda? No, my friend, they do not.
Some dogs should never be bred, and in the hands of someone who is too lazy to prevent breeding, perhaps sterilization is the better option. But not for every dog, and certainly not for most...could you imagine what it would be like if someone suddenly decided we should have our children spayed and neutered?
Frightening concept.!
Crys

by LAVK-9 on 07 February 2010 - 00:02
~L~

by blair built gsd on 07 February 2010 - 04:02
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top