Breeding to Scores!! - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

CrzyGSD

by CrzyGSD on 13 April 2009 - 18:04

Schutzhund has become a sport instead of a breed worthyness. Hope they don't water it down more by taking away the courage test. Bad enough they took away the attack out of the blind from the SchH1.

    Mark
www.ultimatekanine.com

yellowrose of Texas

by yellowrose of Texas on 13 April 2009 - 18:04

Larry , good to have  you post. I agree with you totally, and Mystere, I have seen the same thing in a high point, WUSV contender, SChH 3 winner, who growled consistently at humans and was warned to BE CAREFUL around him  ? WHY?

Larry's reputation speaks for me.

by DDRshep on 13 April 2009 - 18:04

Schutzhund is used both as a breed test and a sport so its really 2 different applications. Scores are related to the sport aspect. The sport is more of a contest between trainers, and less between dogs. So anyone breeding to the scores is confusing the 2 different applications. No different than confusing a hammer for a screwdriver. Probably better to use the scores if one were breeding the trainers and one wanted a child that would grow up to be a good dog trainer.

by DannyJ on 15 April 2009 - 07:04

I put out 3-4 scorebooks of dogs i like and i let the bitch pick:) Sometimes its good sometimes its not. Normally they like black dogs, cause once you go black..... LOL
On the serious side... I'm probably one of the only people who would ship a bitch to breed to a sch1 dog, so that pretty much sums up my thinking of breeding to scores.
However I do have to argue one point for the high competition dog. It takes a decent amount of nerve, stamina and resilience for a dog to continue to be trained at a level for high sport. Not only qualifying, but to stay in peak condition and to travel to the event and then place high year after year in new countries, new climates, perhaps change of diets.
So the scorebook may be useless but the value in competition is still there... you still have to know what your looking at.
Nothings changed... nor will it ever.

Dan Juros

MVF

by MVF on 15 April 2009 - 07:04

DDRShep makes a fine and funny point about scores reflecting trainers.  But surely we'd have a pass-fail system if we really didn't think they mattered for the breed?  I only know OB well, but the difference between a dog who earns titles with competitive versus low scores is night and day.  You would not ignore scores in breeding unless you were asking for trouble.

And Gustav - yes, thanks for the reminder. 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top