Dog Bleeds to Death after Microchip Procedure.. - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

4pack

by 4pack on 04 February 2009 - 00:02

I don't want to microchip my dogs or myself for that matter. I'll stick with tattoos and tags. I HATE being FORCED by law to do anything. I'd be seriously pissed if this happened to me because I wasn't given the choice.

windwalker18

by windwalker18 on 04 February 2009 - 00:02

As chips go under the skin... and a Rabies vac often goes into the muscle.. I agree.. there's a HUGE percent larger chance of a hemorrage with that than with chipping... There is also a much larger chance of Charlie getting lost and destroyed in a shelter for lack of ID than bleeding from a chipping...  Making chips affordable, and having them done upon 1st Rabies vac makes a lot of sense when you look @ the # of dogs in shelters and being killed every year... better one sad but rare event, than the tens of thousands killed for lack of ID.

by Shandra on 04 February 2009 - 00:02

I have microchipped literally a couple of hundred dogs and cats and even a few horses. There have been times that a select animal bled excessively but was stopped without trouble. The easiest to chip were the really young ones, the skin was much looser and fewer nerve endings.  The local vet prefers to shave the area the chip is being inserted to avoid an air pocket developing. I have also had a couple of older dogs whos skin was so absolutely tough the needle would not go in. They were sent to the vet to be chipped, he had to actually use a scapel to make a slit to insert the chip. Very unusual that, 2 dogs from the same home.
I can understand how a small breed might bleed to death, the only ones I had that bled excessively were small breeds so I stopped chipping them and referred them to the vet for chipping.


yellowrose of Texas

by yellowrose of Texas on 04 February 2009 - 00:02

MIGSDL:   No one said you were going to Hell for microchipping your dog...you put that conotaation on something totally wrong.


US government has a plan in place , and has for several years, to chip all new babies born after a certain year, so all citizens can be traced and found...and not hide from USA dictatorship..That time has not come yet, so you dont have to worry...I will not take the mark of the beast or have my children, ha ha ha , too old for that, chipped to be found by a governamental agency.

THINGS ARE DONE FOR REASON IN THIS COUNTRY, SOMETIMES MAKING INNOCENT PEOPLE BELIEVE IT IS DONE FOR A GOOD REASON OR FOR YOUR BENEFIT..

WHY  do you think Stalin said many years ago...very plainly,,,The americans will be taken over from within and sneak right in the back door...
You can choose not to believe, but when the time comes, you will say...why did I not listen.


YR

by Uglydog on 04 February 2009 - 01:02



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 9, 2007

Damning research findings could spell the end of VeriChip...
The Associated Press will issue a breaking story this weekend revealing that microchip implants have induced cancer in laboratory animals and dogs, says privacy expert and long-time VeriChip opponent Dr. Katherine Albrecht.

As the AP will report, a series of research articles spanning more than a decade found that mice and rats injected with glass-encapsulated RFID transponders developed malignant, fast-growing, lethal cancers in up to 1% to 10% of cases. The tumors originated in the tissue surrounding the microchips and often grew to completely surround the devices, the researchers said.

Albrecht first became aware of the microchip-cancer link when she and her "Spychips" co-author, Liz McIntyre, were contacted by a pet owner whose dog had died from a chip-induced tumor. Albrecht then found medical studies showing a causal link between microchip implants and cancer in other animals. Before she brought the research to the AP's attention, the studies had somehow escaped public notice.

A 4-month AP investigation turned up additional documents, several of which had been published before VeriChip's parent company, Applied Digital Solutions, sought FDA approval to market the implant for humans. The VeriChip received FDA approval in 2004 under the watch of then Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson who later joined the
company's board.

Under FDA policy, it would have been VeriChip's responsibility to bring the adverse studies to the FDA's attention, but VeriChip CEO Scott Silverman claims the company was unaware of the research.Albrecht expressed skepticism that a company like VeriChip, whose primary business is microchip implants, would be unaware of relevant studies in the published literature.

"For Mr. Silverman not to know about this research would be negligent. If he did know about these studies, he certainly had an incentive to keep them quiet," said Albrecht. "Had the FDA known about the cancer link, they might never have approved his company's product."
Since gaining FDA approval, VeriChip has aggressively targeted diabetic and dementia patients, and recently announced that it had chipped 90 Alzheimer's patients and their caregivers in Florida. Employees in the Mexican Attorney General's Office, workers in a U.S. security firm, and club-goers in Europe have also been implanted.


yellowrose of Texas

by yellowrose of Texas on 04 February 2009 - 01:02

Why sure ole Tommy helped push it thru, he had a monetary investment in the company. It has been proven knowledge many FDA committe members are board members of many food companies, and many pharmacutical companies.and would not dare deny the product to be produced and shipped and marketed no matter what the problems were with it...
Read  Kevin Trudeaus books    The Natural cures they Dont want you to Know about...


YR


by Uglydog on 04 February 2009 - 01:02

Got  ROPE?


by My Guy Kai on 04 February 2009 - 06:02

If this story is even true and not someone trying to further a personal agenda...

Maybe the dog got into some rat bait prior to the chipping, unbeknownst to the owners... most rat bait is an anticoagulant.

I've had a dog returned to me because of his microchip when an old roomate let him out on accident and I wasn't home.  I like them.  But if you have a dog you don't want , the chip is pretty much permanent... no dumping them by the side of the road...lol j/k

Uber Land

by Uber Land on 04 February 2009 - 06:02

Mark of the Beast huh.

How about your damn drivers liscense, state ID, social security #'s ect.
you need all of these things to get work, housing, to get food.

people need to get a grip on this microchip mark of the beast 666 crap.

jletcher18

by jletcher18 on 04 February 2009 - 07:02

sounds like a plubicity stunt to me.

would rather read 100 classified ads on the  main  board than more of this dribble.

off in search of something worth reading

john





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top