This is a placeholder text
Group text
by raymond on 09 September 2010 - 01:09
Wow what a humanitarian you are bee! Just had to get that last little jab in at maggie right? part of this sites problem is people like you who will not let the sleepin dog lay! Go ahead and get another jab at her she has thick skin1
by beetree on 09 September 2010 - 02:09
You aren't making sense, Raymond. There was no jab. My dog died at 14 months, black like hers. You enjoy pain?
It is good-night for me.
It is good-night for me.
by raymond on 09 September 2010 - 02:09
Probably not, because we might have a common reason to be friendly and that won't sit well with your other ideals....says beetree! if your comment was not a jab at maggie then I am king of siam! or your just to freakin blind to see it of you do not care
by beetree on 09 September 2010 - 02:09
That is hers to interpret, not yours, because you do a very poor job.
by Ninja181 on 09 September 2010 - 11:09
Raymond,
In your posting of Beetree's quote to Maggs you left out the last three words.
Where she said, "" but I"m willing.""
Certainly looked like a friendly statement to me. Please read it again Ray.
Thanks
In your posting of Beetree's quote to Maggs you left out the last three words.
Where she said, "" but I"m willing.""
Certainly looked like a friendly statement to me. Please read it again Ray.
Thanks
by raymond on 09 September 2010 - 14:09
Ok so perhaps we should examine the statement sentence for sentence Actually, I do remember that! Can't you post him again, it was about a year or so, ago? Probably not, because we might have a common reason to be friendly and that won't sit well with your other ideals.... but I"m willing. Ok so we will analyze Bee's statement sentence for sentence! (Actually, I do remember that!)affirmation that Bee does remember the picture that maggie post (Can't you post him again, it was about a year or so, ago?) Bee is aking maggie to post the picture again after a years elapsed time! ( Probably not, because we might have a common reason to be friendly and that won't sit well with your other ideals.... but I"m willing.) now Bee makes a premature presumption ( Probably not) that maggie will not post the picture! ( now we must ask ourselves why maggie would not post the picture after such a warm request by a thoughtfull poster) answer (because bee and maggie might have a common reason to to friendly) And the jab follows the sucker punch!Bee declares that it is maggies fault that they cannot be friendly because it will not sit well with maggies other ideals(and that won't sit well with your other ideals.... )Now after bee has delivered two punches she applys the knock out hold !( But I'm willing)! Yes, that humanitarin offer of an extended hand of friendship comes after bee,s evident statements of hostility! Oh we may have something in common that we could be friends over but you will not allow it because of the other standards you hold! so you see maggie it is all your fault that you and bee can not be friends because bee thinks those other standards you have will preclude yous two from being friendly!
by GSDtravels on 09 September 2010 - 14:09
Yes, you're correct, because that has been Maggie's MO. How many people made a truce with her? How many broke that truce? The answer is ONE. And that one would be Maggie! Her past behavior has shown her to be completely intolerant of those that do not hold her views. She has WRONGLY assumed that because she owns a SL dog, SHE is frowned upon. That is her problem, not others'. I own a SL, so what? My dog came from a scumbag breeder, so what? I love my dog and take care of him as if he were the top dog, that's all that matters to me. Maggie is the one with the problem and she's created that all by herself, with no help from beetree.
It was right of beetree to assume such, because she is 100% CORRECT!
It was right of beetree to assume such, because she is 100% CORRECT!
by Ninja181 on 09 September 2010 - 14:09
Raymond,
That was a two coffee post. LOL
I still don't think Beetree meant anything mean by her post, you see it differently and that is fine. It's not a perfect world.
That was a two coffee post. LOL
I still don't think Beetree meant anything mean by her post, you see it differently and that is fine. It's not a perfect world.
by MaggieMae on 09 September 2010 - 15:09
.
by raymond on 09 September 2010 - 15:09
GSD travels: bee tree had no business jabbing at maggie just as sock puppet has no right to insult others! Truce? Truce? tell me what truce has ever been made not to be broken!Now you justify Bee's conduct because of maggies conduct! but you castigate me because of my conduct which is a direct result of yours and others conduct! so I t is aceptable for sp ninja donald you and others to insult curse at and demean others who disagree with you because of our conduct! but your conduct is perfectly acceptable? And bee has contributed nothing to maggies attitude? Oh GSD travels I would like to be your friend but I know that your stinkin attitude will preclude us from ever having a profitable conversation or being friendly! Because of the other valuse you hold it will not allow us to be friends! Hey but I will be the bigger person here: I am willing are you? Uh oh so what will be your response after I have insulted and hurt your fellings! Thats my point! What is good for you to do is not good for others to do!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top