The GSD must SPLIT away from The Alsation! - Page 26

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by linedancer 13 on 26 January 2009 - 19:01

Who  said they were unscored??????  that's just your asumpsion  .
 Linedancer

by Wildmoor on 26 January 2009 - 20:01

Heres one he was mated to Moorsvale Astral Venus At Lewemma, no score recorded
out of this mating produced this dog Lewemma New Yorker At Brightmeadow, who sired litters again no score recorded

by paulie on 26 January 2009 - 20:01

I have had my say re. Linedancer's Male stud, and  i feel just as strongly as the rest of you who have posted, but please, please, dont turn this into a witch hunt. We can debate without vitriol,  let's not forget  that there are probably a few on our side who have compromised their principals for money, and lets be honest, when your in a  financial hole,"needs must."
       So lets us practice that tolerance we expect from others, question the method's of these people by all means, stupid and naive they may be( according to some ) but we have no right whatsoever to question their integrity without irrefutable proof. How can we hope to bridge any divide, when we treating people with such disrespect.
    Regards as usual.
             Paul Rattigan.

tigermouse

by tigermouse on 26 January 2009 - 20:01


 this might answer your questions wildmoor lol... last PM

(no subject)    - Send reply

Sent Jan 26, 2009 07:53 PM from linedancer 13

just putting the ball back in your court like i said i don't run i don't have a problem with you or any body else ,as far as i am concerned my dogs conform with the present KC breed standard ,you may have all the health checks under the sun the moon and the bloody stars but at the end of the day Joe Public don't want them and nor does the KC.So now us so called Alsatian breeders will have to fall in line with KC policy the difference is we are prpaired to bend where as you are not , it's better late than never still dosent mean we will have healther dogs at the end of it.
Linedancer


missbeeb

by missbeeb on 26 January 2009 - 20:01


I respectfully, disagree Paul.  I do not feel like there's a witch hunt on... not when this woman keeps sending me PMs.
 

by paulie on 26 January 2009 - 21:01

Missbeeb.
      
          I understand your reasoning, all i am advocating is tolerance, you and i both know that our path is the right one, but how can
we hope to educate the other side, ( i'm not being facetious ) when we appear to be so pigheaded and unreasonable to any suggestion that they feel just as strongly about their side, as we do ours.  I dont want to get dragged any deeper into this debate, so this my last word on this thread.  ( Hope you had a happy Burns night  )
Regards  Paul.

by Wildmoor on 26 January 2009 - 21:01

Paul
The proof is in KC documention which is available for the public to purchase
It was her who named her dog and then started srending pm's to people, I have just named 1 bitch that was unscored there are more and like I said I have documented evidence from the KC in 3 different formats.
Re principles money doesnt stop me from upholding mine I had a  male with a 0:0 hip score castrated as he had a high grade on his elbows.
Principles and the health and Welfare of our breed come above money in my eyes, and always will.

Pam

by georgehopwood on 26 January 2009 - 21:01

lol wildmoor you are such a bitch..............lol great bitch I have ever the pleasure of knowing

missbeeb

by missbeeb on 26 January 2009 - 21:01


LOL... something you wanna share here, Pam?

by Wildmoor on 26 January 2009 - 21:01

Hi Missbeeb
She couldnt believe it when he got the chop lol
I have a couple of bitches from Czech waiting in Germany I didnt want this male getting the wrong idea, so hes been castrated before they arive.
Pam





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top