The Second amendment 2013 - Page 22

The definition of a hero in my book.
His own choice.

Moons.

Hero Alert !!   

Over 1000 Green Berets signed a letter supporting and will defend the second amendment as originally intended !!! 
 
YAY America !!!!  I knew it, I knew it all along - so glad I never gave up hope. Sooooo glad.



"We are current or former Army Reserve, National Guard, and active duty US Army Special Forces soldiers (Green Berets). We have all taken an oath to “…support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.…” The Constitution of the United States is without a doubt the single greatest document in the history of mankind, codifying the fundamental principle of governmental power and authority being derived from and granted through the consent of the governed. Our Constitution established a system of governance that preserves, protects, and holds sacrosanct the individual rights and primacy of the governed as well as providing for the explicit protection of the governed from governmental tyranny and/or oppression. We have witnessed the insidious and iniquitous effects of tyranny and oppression on people all over the world. We and our forebears have embodied and personified our organizational motto, De Oppresso Liber [To Free the Oppressed], for more than a half century as we have fought, shed blood, and died in the pursuit of freedom for the oppressed."

Full letter at this link.

Hero Alert !!!

Remember I posted 20 Sheriff's supporting the US Constitution and the Second Amendment as originally intended ?

Well, we have 228 now and growing !!!    YAY America !!!! If you see your Sheriff listed at this link - call and tell them thank you for defending the second amendment in the US Constitution - as originally intended !!!!

Supporting the 2nd amendment? What are they saying about more gun control? Of course everyone is supporting the 2nd amendment, BE. Did you watch any of the gun control hearngs yesterday? I'll guess not.  You are comparing apples to oranges. It's not about repealing the 2nd amendment, its about how to keep lunatics from getting their hands on weapons. Did you watch any of the testimony given in CT by the parents of a few of those murdered children or are you one who thinks that was staged?  Maybe those parents were actors too?

The real stats are - about 88% of the American public supports more gun control, specifically background checks for every weapon sold by every dealer and a ban on high capacity magazines. That is supported by around 80% of NRA members too. What exactly is your problem with trying to not sell weapons and high capacity magazines without background checks?

All you Second Amendment as intended supporters - write your County Sheriff. Here is a letter free to use !!! Use it !!! We only have 3,000 County Sheriff's nation wide. Good Luck !!

Include this link in your letter  C.S.P.O.A.  and please include your full contact information. Full contacts need to be documented by law !!!

Dear Sheriff ________________,

As the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in _______________County you were required to take an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Having taken that oath I would like to know if you will honor your oath by refusing to enforce Federal rules, regulations and directives that violate the Constitution and/or the Bill of Rights.

The Second Amendment clearly proclaims that the people have a right to own guns and in the Bill of Rights, the government is prohibited from infringing on the right of the people to own guns if they choose to do so.

Your primary job is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and the rights of the people that live in ______________ County. The Supreme Court has ruled that the Federal government has no lawful jurisdiction in the counties and that when a Sheriff chooses to enforce an unconstitutional directive, he is violating his Constitutional Oath.

The people of _______________ County are the employer and you are the employee and we expect you to represent us and not the Federal government. As your employer, I would like to know if you are given an order that violates the Constitution, will you honor your oath or will you do as directed by the President of the United States.

Sincerely,_________________
 

Having taken that oath I would like to know if you will honor your oath by refusing to enforce Federal rules, regulations and directives that violate the Constitution and/or the Bill of Rights.

Define - "regulations and directives that violate the Constutution and/or the Bill of Rights" It sounds like much ado about nothing if one can't define specifically what it means to violate the Constitution and By-Laws.

What about the rights of those little kids in Newtown to be able to attended school without being murdered? The rights of a teenager to go to a park without being killed? Why do you think only  gun owners have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

I don't have a problem with background checks really.  I just don't think they are going to do a damn thing about anything.  It's one of those "feel good" laws.  I personally don't have a huge need or desire to get a gun TODAY.  I can wait a few days, BFD to me.  But then the NRA isn't exactly wrong when they say law abiding owners are the ones that are going to have to "pay" for the criminals. they'll continue to get their guns, same as always, by breaking the law, which conincidently is often how they use them.

High capacity magazines??  so they have to carry in a couple more clips in a situational shooting that is very rare.  a small percentage of shootings involve these types of weapons.  Congrats on "doing something".

My question is for all of you, when an "assault weapons" ban, and magazine capacity limitation, and background checks don't make any percievable dent in  crimes, what is your next proposal?

i'm sorry about the kids that had their right to go to school and not be murdered violated.  I'm sorry a teenager had their right to go to a park and not be shot taken by some lunatic with a gun.  Are you really so blind that you can't see that having an unarmed populace also comes at a hefty price tag?  It's been evident throughout history, losses much bigger than 20 kids in a school or a teenager in a park.  It's not gun owners that are commiting these crimes, they're called criminals, pass all the laws you want, you won't stop them by passing laws.  

Blitzen, your numbers are not correct.

Everybody is in favor of background checks, we already have them in place.

The problem is they want to control what is beyond their jurisdiction.

All you people can come up with is rifles and magazines and that's really pathetic.
You can't ban something that flows freely in and out of our country daily

And to use those children to emotionally blackmail the country is disgusting.
Mark Kelly and Gabby Giffords reminded me of Sara Brady and Jim in that wheel chair.

Do dead children stop us from causing and carrying out wars?
That doesn't bother you a bit does it?

What about all the children who died at the hands of Janet Reno that day in Texas?

Your emotions seem very selective.