
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Koots on 12 March 2016 - 21:03
So basically the differences between the two are that the bitch was fed raw while with second litter, and it being her second time with pups. It would be interesting to find out if others have noticed such a difference between litters under similar/same instances. More readily available and digestible nutrient sources for the dam from the raw food makes up the difference in bone density of the pups? Correlation or coincidence?
by vk4gsd on 12 March 2016 - 22:03
I have no idea what that means other than repeating is not cloning.

by Xeph on 13 March 2016 - 00:03
Not a biologist but the number of possible permutations in individual genes allows a large variation in repeat litters.
It absolutely does :) Lots of people repeat thinking they will get exactly the same thing. I repeated my litter hoping for more temperaments like I got in the first litter (successful), but really was not expecting the same animals physically. In certain aspects, I got better animals

by srfwheat on 13 March 2016 - 01:03

by bubbabooboo on 14 March 2016 - 18:03

by susie on 14 March 2016 - 18:03
Bubba, I don´t think genetics do change " that easy ", " normal "environment is able to change behavior, beliefs, health and outlook.
Genes in itself will only be modified by extreme exposure ( poison, chemicals, radiation, deseases, or else ).

by Xeph on 15 March 2016 - 02:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top