
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by p59teitel on 24 February 2007 - 14:02

by allaboutthedawgs on 24 February 2007 - 18:02
Thanks to all. I took a printout of this thread and had a long talk with husband. I showed him one GSD rescue sight that had two puppies. One had exactly the same goofy, happy go lucky expression as ours. When he saw that puppy in a shelter and this thread it was enough to reassure him that we were, indeed, making the right decision. He still doesn't "get" the titles thing, but, like I said, he leaves dog things to me. None of it was about the money for him. Just wanted a "replica" of Remmy.
I was going to go through with it regardless. At least now he'll be fully on board with it.
Thanks again,
dawg
by D.H. on 24 February 2007 - 18:02

by allaboutthedawgs on 24 February 2007 - 19:02
DH-I'm not easily influenced by other people's opinions. I was going to get her fixed regardless. But I preferred to put his misgivings to rest first if possible.
As far as the pedigree goes, I've had more than one person say this. Your right. That doesn't make it true just because they said it. I don't think, in the long run it matters though, as I won't be perpetuating he lines. I don't think factoring in two well known breeders opinions makes me weak minded or inferior. I don't think, in the long run it matters though, as I won't be perpetuating he lines.
I'll be totally honest, I didn't have a clue about pedigree when I bought her. I did every misstep a person could. I certainly meant no disrespect to her breeders who could burp more information than I posses about breeding. I hope it's obvious by my posts and our private correspondence that I am impressed as hell with her as a dog. And what a great idea to tell him we can always get another with similar bloodlines. For me this is good to keep in mind too.
But, for me (and now my husband) it comes down to puppy placement. It would make me insane wondering what happeded to them when they left my hands. I didn't expect to be reproved, especially on this board, for not choosing to breed. And I have no intention of going through Sch training with her for personal reasons, therefore no Sch titles, KKL, etc..
But, I do appreciate the overall suggestions you gave.
Dawg

by allaboutthedawgs on 24 February 2007 - 19:02
OOps! In the process of editing that it came out with duplications and different wording than I meant to end up with. No offence intended.
Dawg
by D.H. on 24 February 2007 - 20:02

by allaboutthedawgs on 24 February 2007 - 20:02

by Shelley Strohl on 25 February 2007 - 00:02

by Chris Hruby on 25 February 2007 - 01:02
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top