This is a placeholder text
Group text
by bazza on 20 March 2010 - 08:03
bump
by missbeeb on 20 March 2010 - 10:03
by bazza on 20 March 2010 - 16:03
Whilst reading the verdict on the persom mentioned in the Videx link i came across a statement i think made by someone on the offenders team it read
"We recognise that it is essential that those showing dogs at events such as this
maintain respectful standards in the treatment of judges and THEIR
DECISIONS"
That's unless of course you are a GSD judge, who's decisions in future can be questioned by anyone who decides they know better, WTF!!!!
"We recognise that it is essential that those showing dogs at events such as this
maintain respectful standards in the treatment of judges and THEIR
DECISIONS"
That's unless of course you are a GSD judge, who's decisions in future can be questioned by anyone who decides they know better, WTF!!!!
by Sue B on 20 March 2010 - 17:03
Spot On Bazza. Also one has to wonder just exactly what part of the KC Undertaking that the KC insist has to apply to all GSD Breed Clubs do the KC themselves have to adhere to? Will Catherine Symms be writing her annual report on what happened at the show and what the judge promoted since, according to her playmate Caroline Kisko and good ole Claire the GSD he promoted was alledgedly unsound !! Guess as usual it will be one rule for us and another for them, a case of DO AS WE SAY , not as we do.
Regared
Sue
Regared
Sue
by bazza on 21 March 2010 - 08:03
bump
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top