
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by hutch on 26 February 2010 - 13:02
by Penny on 26 February 2010 - 13:02
the first REGIONAL show is being held by the League, and its a very welcome event, so progress is in fact speeding on at a great rate. Judt we get our dissapointments in the form of premier clubs selling out to blackmail. Mo.
by Mackenzie on 26 February 2010 - 13:02
Mackenzie
by peterlee on 26 February 2010 - 14:02
There is one important issue here. Many clubs have or will sign up to this tyrannical KC undertaking. However, almost everyone who takes this breed seriously knows that the only way to make real progress for the breed is under WUSV rules. Therefore a club (or clubs) dedicated to WUSV rules and standards is needed to bring together all the (very many) people who think along the same lines.
Penny is right. Huge progress is being made. The Regional Show to be held on 25th April is evidence of that and massive credit to the organisers of it. But we need an infrastructure of clubs which strive to follow WUSV rules to support these events. Whether we start with one national club or with local clubs and what they are called does not matter greatly in comparison to setting this infrastructure up in the first place.

by Sue B on 26 February 2010 - 14:02
You wont get any argument from me at all, If you sign up to the Undertaking then you MUST Adhere to every aspect of it. Those are the RULES WE WILL ALL EXPECT TO ENTER YOUR SHOWS UNDER, SO YOU HAD BETER MAKE SURE YOU ARE PREPARED TO UPHOLD THEM. PERSONALLY I WILL LOOK FORWARD TO ATTENDING SHOWS WHERE NO DOUBLE HANDLING OF ANY KIND TAKES PLACE it will make a pleasant change for me to not have to compete with the 'Teams' consisting of younger people able to attract all the way around the ring or sit someone at every corner. Not sure the atmostphere will be as enjoyable, but in keeping with what Brian Wooton believes when he said at the November 09 Open Forum "We dont go to shows to enjoy ourselves!!!" Well thats what he said and obviously some must agree with him????
Best Regards
Sue

by CAROL on 26 February 2010 - 15:02
Oh what fun, not.....but as you said, "we dont go to shows to enjoy ourselves".
by peterlee on 26 February 2010 - 15:02

by missbeeb on 26 February 2010 - 15:02
I kind of get the feeling that a lot of people are waiting on someone else to take the reins; a great start has been made, but there's no clear "leader" as such. The BC have had nothing to say as far as I'm aware, which is pretty piss poor imo.
Can we look to the GSDP?
by Penny on 26 February 2010 - 15:02
GSDP? Joe Summerhill - Yes - John Cullen - Yes - Nikki Farley - Yes - Sid Farley - Yes - Andrew Winfrow
Do you know I am not sure even who is still there or not there with the GSDP but I know they did a sterling job, but were hampered by some member of the GSDP not arriving for a meeting or something of the like....perhaps we should see how it can be revived with the right people on it together with the ones that still care.. The B.C. meeting on the subject of the KC Undertaking was very poor. The AGM was bnrought forward greatly to embrace this item following a letter to Sheila from myself. I was extremely concerned that the AGM was after the 31st March..
I expected a formal discussion point for point, and Aims and Objectives to the discussion.
We got - lots of passionate opinions, and some KC opinions, and some long KC opinions from folk not even affiliated to a club at the AGM - it was really a lively discussion from both sides, but nothing came of it, and I think the idea to write to KC and ask re clause 9 was a total red herring that will not bring forth a reply before the end of voting on 31st March - or 21st Feb if you are BAGSD. or ever in straight terms rather than waffle, hope I am proved wrong, but even if I am it still does not put right the dictatorship in the other clauses that will cause committees to drop like flies from running a show. Mo.
by peterlee on 26 February 2010 - 15:02
Anyway, enough of that. It is water under the bridge. Any help with locating a copy of the SV constitution please?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top