
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by GranvilleGSD on 09 September 2011 - 04:09
by Jaclyn4238 on 09 September 2011 - 04:09

by BlackthornGSD on 09 September 2011 - 04:09
Even if you use the new thinking of bicolor being created by a modifier gene instead of being its own pattern, it's very unlikely that you'd get a bicolors and solid blacks. I kinda went through the theory on page 5 of the thread: http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/bulletins.read?mnr=506411&pagen=5

by darylehret on 09 September 2011 - 05:09

by BlackthornGSD on 09 September 2011 - 06:09

by AmbiiGSD on 09 September 2011 - 08:09
How many times have we all had this arguement? and how many times are people only looking at one breed, we need to look at how tan-point is carried in other breeds to understand the genes better.
As to what the pups are, I'd rather wait and see.

by pod on 09 September 2011 - 10:09
It has been known, from breeding data, that the saddle allele doesn't exist in A locus for some years. Malcolm Willis abandoned use of as as far back as 1991, in his last GSD book. And now we have DNA evidence to confirm that this is the case.
by JakodaCD OA on 09 September 2011 - 11:09
by eichenluft on 09 September 2011 - 12:09
anyway as I said I doubt the puppies are bicolor - it can be hard to tell if black/tan puppies will be bicolor or not for several weeks. solid black... that's the question IMO. where did that come from, with a female who apparently "shouldn't" carry black? do you have a pedigree to look at?

by darylehret on 09 September 2011 - 13:09
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top