Re: USCA's Aggressive Dog Policy

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Mystere on 23 June 2011 - 16:06

The USCA policy is on the USCA website. I frankly do not care that the procedure was flawed in this instance--the result was correct, particularly in light of this public hearing.

I believe that the city officials are correct to be suspcious of the assertion that the dog is dead. Really, who dumps a dead dog in a dumpster?

by sueincc on 23 June 2011 - 16:06

I agree Mystere, UScA did the right thing, 100%.

by Hedi on 23 June 2011 - 16:06

I am even more glad that the sport of Schutzhund was not mentioned aside from UScA or other club affliation. Would not want to see that headline. Wow.

by Bob McKown on 23 June 2011 - 16:06

Oh the doom and gloomers on the grass roots site are using this to try to make a politcal point... Just more bullshit... USCA ruling was fine, I feel for the dog and if it were too much dog for the handler I,d ask who sold this dog to Greene? did he know there was a issue? did he have any idea,s the handler wasnt experienced enough for this dog?

The Victoms af the bites and the dog are the looseres here. I find it hard to believe the dog is dead.

by sueincc on 23 June 2011 - 16:06

It's all just more wild speculation at this point. For all we know the dog developed some sort of medical condition, perhaps a brain tumor, that caused him to bite and then ultimately took his life, or maybe the guy got fed up and shot the dog in the head and dumped the body or the guy gave the dog to someone else. We just don't know and I think we should learn from some of the more idiotic posts on the grass roots board not to speculate, just the facts, please.

by Mystere on 23 June 2011 - 16:06

Sue, you are correct. But, if the dog IS alive and well, I just hope it is now in the hands of one of the "doom and gloomers"--hopefully the Head Elf. That would almost be poetic justice right there!!

by jettasmom on 23 June 2011 - 16:06

I will say that the combo of genetics and training play a big role of why this dog turned out the way he did. The dog should have been put down before he was sold the first time.

Denise

by Mystere on 23 June 2011 - 17:06

Mr. Green had better get ready to be sued for everything except his drawers.

Also, every helper who worked this dog, and thus assisted it in becoming what it did, had better batten down the hatches, too. I've been trying to warn helpers about working dogs with questionable temperaments for over a decade. Some listen; some don't . But, there are helpers in the Mid-East region who can tell you that it is a real risk of liability, as they ended up on the receiving end of a lawsuit after a dog attacked a man at a seminar. So, if any of the individuals who have been defending the dog's temperament on lists also happen to be helpers who worked the dog.... well, I just hope they aren't USCA members.

by jettasmom on 23 June 2011 - 17:06

I was referring to the dog's handler's since the dog had a few of them, not the helpers who worked the dog. The dog's temperment was questionable way before the dog bit 5 people. The dog should have been put down before he was sold the first time. Again the dog ALWAYS pays the price of human irresponsibilty.

Denise

by faq2 on 23 June 2011 - 17:06

Mr. Greene bought this dog trained by some else so he could have fun and show him. He was taking advantage of by people in the dog world that openly post vids here and youtube of there dogs doing bite scenes with rubber hands! These people are not trainers. They teach dogs to be liabilities for future dog buyers. They are probably laughing all the way to the bank, and it is sad that the dog and Mr. Greene got caught up in the scam. On youtube under hawk k9 or here on viperk9.
These are the type of people that breeders should not sell dogs to in the first place!

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

Re: USCA's Aggressive Dog Policy - Page 2

Pedigree Database