110 Years of the GSD - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Gustav on 24 October 2010 - 01:10

For What????? Even the top herding dogs don't have this structure.....so why have we created a structure like this....For what??????

GSDguy08

by GSDguy08 on 24 October 2010 - 01:10

sonora...breeders have improved.....what....are you kidding me?  Dogs were never meant to look like they're in pain, or like a frog shape in the rear structure.  This all helps inprove the movement?  I know if I was thinking of an actual working dog and not a dog who trotts pretty around a ring, I'd prefer a dog who can move faster and hit harder....something Mals are known for.  Can you tell me how they've improved the working ability of the showlines? I doubt it.....

by sonora on 24 October 2010 - 07:10


Hi Guys,

Don't get excited,
all I said was ,various structural aspects of the G S D  ,have improved.

Sorry Gustave, the standard acts as a guideline for many .
WHAT FOR , I guess,for improvement  of trotting ability, looks ,money, etc.
Maybe others can help out.


GSDguy08, I totally agree with you, But we are talking of G S D's.
Now if  someone can post  a similar post showing the improvment of the working G S D
 for us to see,I'm sure we all will be able to appreciate the improvements.

Your ref.below is a fantastic dog , I'm sure he is an improvment of earlier working dogs.

V 1ST CLASS 5JV1/P Navar Hronovsky pramen.

All I am asking is for working dog people to post the improvements in the working dogs from the past till now. All is said in good faith.

Rugers Guru

by Rugers Guru on 24 October 2010 - 17:10

The earlier working dog IS foundation for the showlines. Some have improved, some have declined. The video is the artery of the later.

Renee
http://workingk9.lefora.com/

by Percy Longfellow on 27 October 2010 - 12:10

That was...depressing.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top