
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Red Sable on 25 March 2010 - 18:03
by TessJ10 on 25 March 2010 - 18:03
by hodie on 25 March 2010 - 18:03
by TessJ10 on 25 March 2010 - 18:03
by hodie on 25 March 2010 - 18:03

by Two Moons on 25 March 2010 - 19:03
In the first place I am not worried about Vitamin C deficiency in my dogs, besides they love chewing carrot sticks and it's a lot less concern than those crappy raw hide sticks, messy and full of chemicals.
If your feeding right you shouldn't have any worries about deficiencies of any kind.
And I'll take anything in natural form over a man made supplement any day of the week.
Too much does more harm than good, in my opinion.
I don't even take C pills, oranges and juice work better and have more benefits in general, including the enjoyment of flavor.
Fresh is the key, fresh meat, fresh veggies, and home grown rules, including buying meat from local sources instead of chain stores or Wallyworld.
Wallyworld will kill you for the bottom line, (beef products, may come from China, Mexico, or Canada, but we won't tell you which one on the label).
Sorry,
starting to rant.
I just don't like Wal-mart.
Moons.

by WillowValleyGSD on 25 March 2010 - 20:03
Vit. C is a water soluble Vit, therefore, if too much is given, the remained not used is flushed from the body. Many websites discourage the use of Vit. C with Canines stating that it is "synthesized in the liver of healthy dogs". I, personally, do supplement. As with anything else, it's an individual preference. Here is just one of the many articles floating around on the web with information. It discusses other Vitamins as well. Hope it helps . You will likely get many different answers in regard to dosage, I wish you luck.
http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?c=2+1662&aid=712
by hodie on 25 March 2010 - 20:03
But let's not mix up fact from fiction. Articles like peteducation where one does not even know the author or the background or they are trying to sell products are not my idea of a reliable reference. There are no citations to any sort of documentation. Further, if one looks hard, often you see the same information pasted from one single source statement to web site after web site. That does not make it science or truth. Without disciplined studies that are based on the scientific method, one just makes it all up. Anecdotal statements are just that. And someone making them might not even have anything to hang their hat on except to say that when I did X, Y happened, so it must be that X was responsible. I can say I just took a "yellow pill" and went out for a bike ride and fell off my bike. That does not mean that the "yellow pill" was responsible for that. There are newer studies that disprove ANY real benefit from supplementation. The U.S. is filled with people making a mint off of other people who buy supplements of all kinds, without any real benefit and many times, those supplements are in fact harmful. In humans and dogs, for example, there are a host of studies disproving any benefit to claims that the immune system is boosted. But people believe what they want to believe and that is fine.
by beetree on 25 March 2010 - 20:03

by hodie on 25 March 2010 - 20:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top