This is a placeholder text
Group text
by SitasMom on 07 November 2009 - 15:11
thanks
by malshep on 07 November 2009 - 21:11
Cute puppy, do you have more pictures of the whole litter ?
Always,
Cee
Always,
Cee
by oso on 08 November 2009 - 12:11
With my puppies I can usually tell at 2 weeks, definitely by 3 weeks, but on this board I have seen a couple of photos in other threads that left me unsure! However the puppy posted here is definitely not a long coat, no question.
by luvdemdogs on 08 November 2009 - 21:11
what a precious pup!!!!
by SitasMom on 09 November 2009 - 02:11
black and tan or black and red???
by mking on 09 November 2009 - 03:11
Cute Puppy! I would say black and tan.
by Keith Grossman on 09 November 2009 - 15:11
I've noticed a distinguishing characteristic that is present essentially from birth and I have only ever seen it with coats. It's hard to describe but the fur on the bottoms (backs) of the forearms of coats sees to have a pattern...looks sort of like a part...that I have not seen on pups with standard coats.
by SitasMom on 10 November 2009 - 03:11
Hanny is stock, but very plush.......I'm hoping this one turns out the same.
I'll look at the forearms.........thanks
I'll look at the forearms.........thanks
by mahon on 10 November 2009 - 04:11
Here is a pic of a 5 week long coat. Notice the brissles of hair on the muzzle and the wavey hair on the ears.
This is the puppy Yellowrose was sure was not going to be a longcoat. The muzzles also appear to be more pie shaped then the non coats when looking straight on at the tip of the nose.
This is the puppy Yellowrose was sure was not going to be a longcoat. The muzzles also appear to be more pie shaped then the non coats when looking straight on at the tip of the nose.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top