
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by MVF on 10 May 2009 - 06:05
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/bulletins_read/154581.html#154630
by oso on 10 May 2009 - 12:05

by MaggieMae on 10 May 2009 - 18:05
http://home.att.net/~wdcusick/013.html
by oso on 11 May 2009 - 00:05
by alaman on 11 May 2009 - 00:05
by SitasMom on 11 May 2009 - 02:05

by Rik on 11 May 2009 - 03:05
If you need to tape the ears then do so. There is nothing else to be done now that you have the dog. I know this is a very frustating thing and from my experience, it is almost always a genetic trait.
If you are talking about the South East Regional in Atlanta, I plan to be there also with a male pup.
Best,
Rik

by MVF on 11 May 2009 - 04:05
This guy recommends 3 grams a day - although that seems dangerous to me.
http://neuro.vetmed.ufl.edu/neuro/AltMed/Alt_Med_Neuro.htm
Notwithstanding this vet's view, the problem with just giving your dog lots of C is not that it is toxic but that it is acidic. For dogs, you need a ph neutral way of giving C for best digestion (and to avoid flatulence) -- and that's calcium ascorbate or magnesium ascorbate. It is best to give calcium ascorbate with threonate added. That mix has been shown to be safe. You can also safely give Ester C.
Some studies have shown dogs to be intolerant of C. That is hard to reconcile with good science, although it may be true for some dogs. in my personal experience I used to be religious about giving vitamin C and my last three shepherds lived to be 13, 13, and 14. I got careless and gave C very sporadically and lost my last dog before her 6th birthday-- to kidney failure, the supposed problem with C, itself. I don't buy that argument. C is a very beneficial vitamin that is easily excreted and there is no good reason to believe it accumulates in the dog's kidneys unless you give megadoses for a long time.

by MVF on 11 May 2009 - 04:05
I have read Cusick's article cited above and although I respect his credentials as a chemist, his tone is not quite right. There is something too dogmatic and self-promoting about his argument for me to trust that one should really never supplement with C. I can say as an academic that Cusick is probably not one, and has adopted a very adversarial tone instead of advancing a balanced argument.
by oso on 11 May 2009 - 12:05
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top