
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Two Moons on 12 February 2009 - 18:02
Indy would not let the vet shove anything up his ass either... I had to provide a stool sample later.
Maybe if the lights had been down low and the vets hands were warmer, maybe some soft music...LOL

by cktoone on 12 February 2009 - 18:02

by Two Moons on 12 February 2009 - 18:02

by MVF on 12 February 2009 - 19:02
This is a loaded question around here, but here's my two cents.
Long term studies of longevity show that thinness is positively correlated with length of life...BUT...this does not reflect quality of life. See the Capuchin monkey studies, publicized in many media in recent years.
Further, many diseases ARE CATABOLIC which means the disease process degrades musculature and burns fat. Without a margin of fat and muscle, a dog IS more vulnerable.
If you are competing heavily and your dog is most effective at a thin weight (say 70 lbs) then keep him at that thin weight during the season, but that does NOT mean he should be kept at 70 pounds in the OFF SEASON. This is something every competitive athlete knows (PERIODIZATION). You MUST cycle your weight if you compete in a weight-senstive sport (like distance running or wrestling) -- so the low weight during competition is probably 5 lbs lower than the healthiest weight off season.
As for your 7 month bitch at 45 pounds -- she may in fact be slightly underweight for perfect health, but that's not obvious. If she is 45 lbs because you exercise her 1-2 hours a day, great! If she is that thin from lack of caloric intake, shame on you.
My own bottom line is this: when a heavy person shows me his thin dog with pride, I get suspicious. When a fit athlete brags about hours of hiking and training and running with his fit dog, I beam with him. Thin due to conditioning is very different than thin due to inadequate nutrition. The whole biological product is very different (but let's skip the science here, as I suspect I will be scolded by the skinny-dog-fanatics and I need to save some ammunition for my defense!)
None of this should be interpreted to suggest that a fat dog is healthy!

by Jenni78 on 13 February 2009 - 16:02

by Rezkat5 on 13 February 2009 - 18:02
I work at a vet and my boss drives me crazy with the dogs she calls "thin." Meanwhile she's a toothpick herself! We had a client bring in a GSD that was a titled import and one of her comments was "thin" though not to the owner, just in her report.
The younger vets are better and actually like how I keep my dogs. However she does know better to say that she thinks they are too thin.
Meanwhile, she's a got a young Rottie with not very good joints due to being hit by a car as a young dog, that I would be keeping way thinner than she is.
My "little female" according to some is 58 pounds. However the Koermeister actually called her "large" in the critique, she's 59 CM. Go figure!

by Kalibeck on 14 February 2009 - 04:02

by Mum of Zoe on 14 February 2009 - 15:02



by animules on 14 February 2009 - 16:02
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top