
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Bob McKown on 09 February 2009 - 15:02
4pack:
I bow to the expert...

by 4pack on 09 February 2009 - 16:02

by snajper69 on 09 February 2009 - 16:02
"It’s not so hard to tie a dog to a tree and beat it with a pole to make it aggressive. to each his own." - lol Do you really think of PPD training in this category? lol My dog was never tied to a pole, she has a sweet nature on top of being trained in PPD, love to be rubbed on a belly but if you not part of the pack you better back off.
SCH is a routine, dog is expected to perform according to judge’s expectation (it's not an easy routine because you aim for perfection, and I have respect for every one who is in SCH because it takes a lot of effort and time to reach the ultimate goal of SCHIII).
PPD is getting ready your dog for the real life, scenario changes all the time, dog is taught to think on his own, while still being under control of his handler. You don't aim for flashy obedience but good obedience. Your dog will actually get challenged during a routine (real hits, with stick, hose, even patio furniture, it will be expected to deal with all the obstacles that it might face in real life), your dog will be expected to engaged on a static decoy, but at all the time it has to be responsive to it's handler, it will be taught to engage on his own when a decoy engages his handler. If you think is as easy as tying dog to a pole, please prove it.
Weather is SCH, PPD or any other discipline it will have it's pros and cons, no discipline is perfect, rather than dissing one over another why not learn from each other?
by Bob McKown on 09 February 2009 - 17:02
h
by Bob McKown on 09 February 2009 - 17:02
by Bob McKown on 09 February 2009 - 17:02
Hey i,m all up for someone coming in and saving 'hey this is what we do come check it out" but the whole original disertation smacks of "jab" why does there need to ba a "jab".
4pack: you should be well vearsed in ignorance obviously you live it.

by 4pack on 09 February 2009 - 17:02

by Mystere on 09 February 2009 - 18:02
This is such a lovely way to begin fostering interest in your sport with those already engaged in a different sport. Good Luck and Best Wishes in your endeavors.
Quote: Liability is yet another thing that complicates matters for us. Protection Dog Training Club's position on liability is that we believe in controlled dogs. Controlled due to inherent stability and obedience training and/or controlled by limiting public access to the dog. The rest we don't give a shit about. The dog throughout history has been a guardian of family and property and we're not going to succumb to cultural pressures advocating that all dogs must be animated stuffed toys.
The laissez-faire attitude inherent in this statement truly frightens me. Are you aware that in some states, a dog protecting you and your property, even from a potentially felonious assault has NO defense to a dangerous dog charge? In fact, could end up with YOU being charged with a felony? Ignorance is certainly bliss. I leave Mr. Murray to his opinion, and will not waste my time. You are going to really need those good wishes...
4pack--please call me, if you are operating under Mr. Murray's "don't give a shit" misapprehension. You, I am concerned for; him I leave to his beliefs.

by 4pack on 09 February 2009 - 18:02
Personal Protection is not a sport Nia, it's a lifestyle and yes I would have to agree that the number of people training for just PP is far less than the smallest sport venue.

by 4pack on 09 February 2009 - 18:02
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top