Retraction - Page 19

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by nonacona60 on 07 September 2010 - 06:09

Thats right Jackie, disregard the truth....Listen to sock puppet...
The thread that would validate what I just said, has been deleted...

by Sock Puppet on 07 September 2010 - 06:09

Because it was a bunch of crap and Oli deleted it.

Nona please discuss dogs.

by Slamdunc on 07 September 2010 - 07:09

Well, well, well...I just got home from work at 0230 and have been sifting through all of this:

First, Oli thank you for straightening this mess out. I know this is a "second job" for you and this site is a huge labor of love. Thank you for the excellent forum and Pedigree database which you have put years of work into. It truly has been an excellent resource.

Second, SP you have been vindicated! You must be very relieved, good for you.

Third, to the troll and her group it is obvious who started this and it has backfired.

I am really happy that Oli has stepped in and again made his wishes known. Perhaps now we can get this place back to a dog forum. SP enjoy your victory and once again focus on dog topics. Everyone, please ignore the trolls. Avoid the temptation to answer them or fight with them. Rather than respond to them start a dog related topic, we all know they won't participate in those.

Just thrilled with the outcome.

Jim

by DDR-DSH on 07 September 2010 - 08:09

Worth reading... Just to show that it can and does happen... Someone was responsible for the problems that were happening for months and causing frustration and anger by many people using this forum.

http://www.learnphponline.com/security/sql-injection-prevention-mysql-php

I don't know why Oli said he discovered that Sock Puppet did this and then retracted. Either he did or he didn't, and apparently something went wrong, that he jumped the gun, and then discovered he was mistaken? I just mentioned SQL injection and I guess he freaked and started deleting stuff. No one told him to do that. But, heck.. I lost a lot of emails on an account, and I've lost a website and domain name in the past, and that's just the way it goes. If you keep your own server and backup, that's somewhat of an assurance, but everything is vulnerable on magnetic media, and you can't really hold a third party responsible for holding your work on a free account.

Thrilled? Really? LOL.. I'll just be glad when the wars are over and things can return to calm.

by Sock Puppet on 07 September 2010 - 08:09

Then quit posting. If I never say another word to you again, you will still have people who will.

This is a dog board. People love there dogs and I guess you just cannot see that.

by beetree on 07 September 2010 - 12:09

SP:

I am absolutely delighted for you!

And reading the denials from the Troll brigade has provided much amusement this morning.

Thanks go to Oli for doing the right thing.

by eichenluft on 07 September 2010 - 12:09

Yes, killing a dog by shooting or euthanizing IS better and more humane than dying slowly by starvation, dehydration while sitting in a small crate in their own feces. Absolutely. It's just one of the MANY choices Janice had but chose not to use, in favor of abusing, torturing, starving and neglecting her dogs to the point of near-death.

molly

by MAINLYMAX on 07 September 2010 - 15:09

Oli,
This is my German shepherd Bruno, that Sock Puppet sold me. He
is very easy to train, but I think maybe I will just use him for show. Sock says
he will be a sable, so don't think that his color will stay the same. My question is
did your German shepherd look this good when he was a puppy?

Commits are welcomed!

by Keith Grossman on 07 September 2010 - 16:09

Does this mean that SP didn't hack the sizing chart on Teva's website?

by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 17:09

No. You simply have big feet!

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

Retraction - Page 19

Pedigree Database