
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Liebe on 03 August 2009 - 13:08
Did the Times have the owner's permission to post that photograph? - The dog is certainly familiar . . .

by missbeeb on 03 August 2009 - 13:08
I guess mine was OTT then! I sent it about 9.45 this morning!

by hutch on 03 August 2009 - 14:08
It's funny how the bottom of the photo is missing - is that because it has a watermark and permission has not been granted to reproduce?

by AandA on 03 August 2009 - 15:08
I notice you can order the comments on the Times article by 'Most Recommended' and when you do guess which one comes out on top?
AandA
AandA

by Videx on 03 August 2009 - 15:08
The anti-GSD brigade are much more organised than the pro-GSD brigade, Surely that must be obvious to everybody.
by svbc1 on 03 August 2009 - 15:08
Yes Videx thats a true statement if ever I heard one . I expect now they have read that the anti GSD brigade will be laughing even more, but not for long lets hope !.

by hamza166 on 03 August 2009 - 15:08
How dare they!
How on earth do they think they can get away with such rubbish. I will get back on the KC. The paper says: 'the kennel club has told british breeders of german shepherd dogs, to improve health standards' If we are to follow their standard, especially their new one, and their rules, in which no health tests are needed, there is no way, we can possibly improve the health, using their standard. Below is what they want the gsd to look like:
.jpg)

How on earth can the possibly expect the health of te gsd to get better if they wish for us to prouce ugly creatures lie these. Then they say 'fashion for the exxagerated bump or roach in the back, when the backline of he dog is supposed to be a gentle slope.' WELL I'LL TELL YOU ONE THING, The dogs above or the dog below, dont exctly have a slightly sloped back, but actually an extrmely exxagerated at an angle back. Also they say the 'roach' causes health problems for the gsd, but it actually does not, and their slope causes problems. The slope causes an extrmely sensetive and weak back. It causes the spi9ne to be stiff, disabling he dog form jumping or even running properly. Also it causes the hips to go extremely bad.

They say that we will lose the right to hold championship shows, for the GSD, because it is apparently ur fault that the gsd is in the state it is. It is acutally there fault, because they want the dog to look like the above, and they have no health tests. Plus why is it only the gsd that loses it rights? Perhaps because the GSD is a big organisation around the world, and they fear it could unreveal their lies, like the BBC did.
Then: 'letter sent to all breed clubs concerning health & welfare' They think that 1 letter will make them own us, whereas we sent thousands of letters, about the gsd health, and how they could imporve it, and they just ignored them. Plus the breed clubs, do have neccesary health tests, before a dog can be registered or bred, within them. So it's more that the breed clubs are doing right, and the kennel club is doing wrong. WRONG WRONG WRONG.
PLus the kennel club registered more than 12000 gsd's, and they didnt need any neccesary health tests or screenings, although most of those dogs were tested, by their responsible breeders.
I WILL FIND A WAY TO MAKE MY OWN STATEMENT AND COMMENT, ON THE KENNEL CLUB, SO THAT IT GOES INTO THE TIMES. HOW DID YOU DO IT DAVID, SO I COULD POSSIBLY DO IT.
How on earth do they think they can get away with such rubbish. I will get back on the KC. The paper says: 'the kennel club has told british breeders of german shepherd dogs, to improve health standards' If we are to follow their standard, especially their new one, and their rules, in which no health tests are needed, there is no way, we can possibly improve the health, using their standard. Below is what they want the gsd to look like:
.jpg)

How on earth can the possibly expect the health of te gsd to get better if they wish for us to prouce ugly creatures lie these. Then they say 'fashion for the exxagerated bump or roach in the back, when the backline of he dog is supposed to be a gentle slope.' WELL I'LL TELL YOU ONE THING, The dogs above or the dog below, dont exctly have a slightly sloped back, but actually an extrmely exxagerated at an angle back. Also they say the 'roach' causes health problems for the gsd, but it actually does not, and their slope causes problems. The slope causes an extrmely sensetive and weak back. It causes the spi9ne to be stiff, disabling he dog form jumping or even running properly. Also it causes the hips to go extremely bad.

They say that we will lose the right to hold championship shows, for the GSD, because it is apparently ur fault that the gsd is in the state it is. It is acutally there fault, because they want the dog to look like the above, and they have no health tests. Plus why is it only the gsd that loses it rights? Perhaps because the GSD is a big organisation around the world, and they fear it could unreveal their lies, like the BBC did.
Then: 'letter sent to all breed clubs concerning health & welfare' They think that 1 letter will make them own us, whereas we sent thousands of letters, about the gsd health, and how they could imporve it, and they just ignored them. Plus the breed clubs, do have neccesary health tests, before a dog can be registered or bred, within them. So it's more that the breed clubs are doing right, and the kennel club is doing wrong. WRONG WRONG WRONG.
PLus the kennel club registered more than 12000 gsd's, and they didnt need any neccesary health tests or screenings, although most of those dogs were tested, by their responsible breeders.
I WILL FIND A WAY TO MAKE MY OWN STATEMENT AND COMMENT, ON THE KENNEL CLUB, SO THAT IT GOES INTO THE TIMES. HOW DID YOU DO IT DAVID, SO I COULD POSSIBLY DO IT.
by svbc1 on 03 August 2009 - 16:08
HAMZA. Your heart might be in the right place but I fear if you carry on the way you are doing you will be the oppositions star weapon against us and get us all fried to a crisp !. JUST LEAVE IT TO THE PRO's.
By the way Hamza the first dog you have posted is not that bad if it were stood differently !, Anyone can see the lead has been removed from the photo that is stringing the dogs head up into the sky amonst other things, I'd like to see that dog stood up by one of our side !, I'm not saying its a world beater Hamza but its not a disgrace to the breed .
By the way Hamza the first dog you have posted is not that bad if it were stood differently !, Anyone can see the lead has been removed from the photo that is stringing the dogs head up into the sky amonst other things, I'd like to see that dog stood up by one of our side !, I'm not saying its a world beater Hamza but its not a disgrace to the breed .

by hamza166 on 03 August 2009 - 16:08
ok i might actually get some advice, and some help, before i bother talking to the times, or the kennel club. And ok thanks for he info on the picture.

by Videx on 03 August 2009 - 16:08
Hamza - stand back and observe and learn. Your enthusiasm is heart-warming.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top