
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Abby Normal on 22 April 2013 - 10:04
HM 

by joanro on 22 April 2013 - 11:04
Lenin, Trotsky, and Hitler made such an impact, that they will unfortunately live on in people who are blind to the horrors they inflicted on humanity. Or maybe not blind to it, but admire them for it.

by Prager on 22 April 2013 - 19:04
Abby Normal it is not Liberty if it infringes on other peoples rights. It is a nature of the crime that in order for it to be punished it must be discovered .That is true about any crime. Thus it then follows that as soon as someone who is starving his dogs is discovered must be punished. That is not such a hard logical line to follow.
To the part that people do not do nothing ( which is not what Paul said) I would say that is true about any crime:
To the part that people do not do nothing ( which is not what Paul said) I would say that is true about any crime:
The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that few Good Men Do Nothing.
by eddyelevation on 22 April 2013 - 23:04
wow......dog talk goes a looong way,

by Prager on 23 April 2013 - 13:04
These thumb up and down intrigue me. I understand what people who
. They agree with current statement. But
without comment makes no sense to me. And next this is. What is there to dislike about what for example Joanro said:
Lenin, Trotsky, and Hitler made such an impact, that they will unfortunately live on in people who are blind to the horrors they inflicted on humanity. Or maybe not blind to it, but admire them for it.
6
actually do not agree with this.?! And without comment? It is like 1+1=2. Joanro said that = thus I disagree. What are you 12 year olds?


Lenin, Trotsky, and Hitler made such an impact, that they will unfortunately live on in people who are blind to the horrors they inflicted on humanity. Or maybe not blind to it, but admire them for it.
6


by Slamdunc on 23 April 2013 - 16:04
Hans,
Go up to the top of the page and look at the
Liked top 20 tab. You can see which posts were most liked and most disliked, this thread leads them all. Yes, some people just hit the thumbs up or down and do not comment.
Go up to the top of the page and look at the


by GSD Admin on 24 April 2013 - 01:04
Hans,
My guess is people don't want OT talk on the dog forums. And you guys have gotten way off topic.
My guess is people don't want OT talk on the dog forums. And you guys have gotten way off topic.

by Prager on 24 April 2013 - 11:04
You think we got off the topic?

by GSD Admin on 25 April 2013 - 02:04
Well with that many dislikes I am just guessing here that plenty of members feel you guys are off topic. I read through parts of the thread and yes I believe that talking about Hitler, Lenin and Trotsky are off topic. All the discussion of socialism has nothing really to do with your first post. The government has nothing to do with the FCI. I guess if you can't see this has gotten off topic then we will have to agree to disagree. You asked why people have given so many dislikes and I am trying to tell you my opinion but I am sure you are going to say it is right on topic. So, instead of coming back with more questions and disagreement just get it back on topic.
I will not be answering any more of your questions on this as my opinion has been stated and I am not likely to change it.
I will not be answering any more of your questions on this as my opinion has been stated and I am not likely to change it.

by Prager on 25 April 2013 - 10:04
Many registries under FCI, are closely tied to Government. Like the Czech one. Many laws about how to deal with animals are laws produced by Governments.
This is about such laws and regulations influencing personal Liberty. This is about liberty. Personal liberty. Thus no, I do not think this threat when talking about Liberty is deviated from a topic.
Also
It is just amazing to me what people see/read in comparison what is written. What are you reading? Nowhere have I said anything about "why" people are giving dislikes. I asked why people give dislikes to obvious truisms. And why people give dislikes and make no comment.
It is like saying why is sun hot? And you would see this : Why is sun? Sometimes I think that logical discussion is not possible.
Now that would be of the topic though.
Prager Hans.
This is about such laws and regulations influencing personal Liberty. This is about liberty. Personal liberty. Thus no, I do not think this threat when talking about Liberty is deviated from a topic.
Also
It is just amazing to me what people see/read in comparison what is written. What are you reading? Nowhere have I said anything about "why" people are giving dislikes. I asked why people give dislikes to obvious truisms. And why people give dislikes and make no comment.
It is like saying why is sun hot? And you would see this : Why is sun? Sometimes I think that logical discussion is not possible.
Now that would be of the topic though.
Prager Hans.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top