Retraction - Page 17

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by DDR-DSH on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

OK.. THIS would make sense, to have had a thread ONLY about my conviction and so forth, and you could bump it up as often as you like, but polluting every single thread is senselss and abusive.. not just to me, but to everyone who uses the forum. Does that make sense?

by Sock Puppet on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

Jan,

Just stop and admit. It will cleanse the soul.

SP

by DDR-DSH on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

I just don't have time to follow all of this. Most of the water goes under the bridge and I never see it, unless maybe it is posted again, later on. I probably read at most ten percent of the threads that even interest me or concern me. There just is not time in the day for this. I generally come around only once a week. I hate it when I spend too much time on this forum, because it is not productive, and I have need of my time for other things. A little bird told me that Oli had made a retraction, and so I had to come and check for myself, but now I have things to do.

I think it is evident enough to some people that SOMEONE or SOMETHING has been causing problems with the forum.. disappearing and reappearing threads and comments, and I am not the only one to have complained. I know that SOMEONE is probably hacking the site, and I know that it is very possible via a hacking technique called SQL injection or insertion (can't remember which). If you can trick the server wtih a PHP string that it processes without discriminating, possibly using "wildcards" or other tricks, it can be done. At least Oli now knows to watch for this and fix any security holes he can find. I speculated that this was a problem. I never accused anyone (fictitious or otherwise), and was surprised when Oli said it was Sock Puppet. Now, he says he was wrong. WTF?

Personally, I would never want to manage a forum. I don't even have to explain why. I feel that eventually there will be an alternative to this database for those who are tired of all the garbage that goes on here. Yes, I have heard a LOT of complaints, about the forum in general, and certain foruym posters, specifically. A lot of people miss the old pedigree database and have ntot come back because of the problems.

'Nuff said..

by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

Give it up, SP. An animal abuser can no more accept the truth that the dogs were the victims and not she, anymore than a pedophile can accept that the 7-year-old he raped really wasn't "leading me on."

by Myracle on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

Oli has made abundantly clear why he acted without evidence.

He has never before had an issue TRUSTING what the members of his site have stated to him.
In every other instance, when something has been alleged to him, it was proven to be true.

He had no REASON to distrust the liars who alleged SP was hacking.
It was only upon receiving multiple emails from other members who said it wasn't possible that SP had hacked the site, and again acting on his policy of TRUSTING his members, he conducted further investigation, he discovered that he'd been taken advantage of by a liar who would use his good natured trust to manipulate him into doing their bidding towards their own malignant end.

Sites have issues.
Often it has to do with needed software updates to the software used to run the site.
Sometimes it has to do with an ad that causes issues being hosted on the site.

It doesn't always mean something criminal or malignant is afoot.

by 4pack on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

"stigmata"

"Confession is good for the human soul.

It may also be good for the troll."

Oh Don, your killin' me today.

by Sock Puppet on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

Mudwick you are hired. Lets talk in pm's.

by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 04:09

4pack - troll-smackin' doesn't have to be ALL work and no fun, ya know? :)

by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 05:09

Ah well, time for bed. Hopefully by divine intervention - or some other such miraculous occurrence - the troll and affiliates will somehow acquire enough brains overnight to realize that they've been fully exposed, and that shutting up is really a better policy than continually tonguing the third rail.

by eichenluft on 07 September 2010 - 05:09

Janice - you are a convicted animal abuser and hoarder. Animal hoarders are mentally unstable (this is a proven fact). You had choices 10 years ago - you had the choice to NOT own or keep so many dogs when you couldn't afford to feed them or had too many to properly care for. You had a choice to breed them together to make more dogs, or not. You had a choice to feed them or not. You had a choice to keep them in filthy crates or not. You had a choice to ask for help. You could have done many things to avoid ABUSING, NEGLECTING AND TORTURING the animals that were in YOUR CARE. You could have even turned them over to the pound - brought them there yourself, they would have been better off if you put a bullet into their brains! What you did was MAKE THE CHOICE you made, to ABUSE, NEGLECT, STARVE, TORTURE, AND KILL your dogs slowly and painfully.

Now you own more dogs. You need to be reported to your local authorities who need to check on you regularly to make sure your current animals are cared for. I will start making waves to make sure that is done, and I hope people on this forum who care about the dogs in your "care", do the same. And I hope that people who care about YOU (I am not one of those people) check on YOU and get you the help you need.

molly

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

Retraction - Page 17

Pedigree Database

OK.. THIS would make sense, to have had a thread ONLY about my conviction and so forth, and you could bump it up as often as you like, but polluting every single thread is senselss and abusive.. not just to me, but to everyone who uses the forum. Does that make sense?