Obamacare.....From those who have to those who don't have - Page 13

RS, and some seem to not like Obama no matter what. It cuts both ways and is a cancer in our society. The lobbyists and media chose our President. We are too lazy to do our homework so we take the path of least resistance and believe what we hear on the net, TV or radio. Not only do we believe it, we regurgitate it as if it were gospel. The candidate who is the most likely to win is the candidate that is able to spend the most money on his/her campaign. How freaking sad is that? We don't even know who is backing the candidates thanks to another Supreme court ruling. 

Blitzen, if you want to know who is backing the candidates - follow the money - it's on the FEC website for all to see.

It's not that people dislike Obama, most know by now he has handlers, it's the policies people don't like.

That's OK, BabyEagle, I don't like all of them either, didn't like any of Bush's and so far Romney isn't very impressive and doesn't send to me the message that he will do anything any better. I don't want SS privatized and I don't get a warm, fuzzy feeling thinking that Romney "gets it". All who are railing about Obamacare need to remember that Romney designed and inititated it when he was the Gov against protests of constituents. Now most are happy with it. Is one really any better than the other? Toss a coin..........

"Yeah, I want to see the KEITH LIST! I don't want to be the only list maker on this board. And I'm wondering, Keith, are their any little Keiths or Keithettes running around this world, are YOU a breeder?"

No, I am not.  I think it said, "go forth and multiply until the earth is full."  Well, it's full; you can stop.

"Kieth, how did you see me get out of bed this morning? But you're twelve hours delayed on your comment. As far as my service to this great country, it wasn't all THAT illustrious. But during the Viet Nam conflict, military service was not appreciated the way it is now, even if people were being drafted at the time. Kind of creepy the way you're digging forty years into my history, Kieth. I take it either you are REALLY, REALLY interested in my history or you're just a creep."

Women were never drafted into the military nor did they serve in combat in Vietnam.  At least you're only alluding to your non-existent service rather than coming right out and lying about it.

Kieth you consummate moron, if you were able to comprehend what you read, I said " DURING THE VIET NAM CONFLICT". I didn't say I was in Viet Nam, and just to clarify for you, military service was not appreciated during that time like it is now EVEN THO PEOPLE WERE BEING DRAFTED. I was a Medic in the Women's Army Corp, strictly volunteer branch of the service which was eventually incorporated into the Regular Army. Serving in the military DURING a war or conflict does not mean being in active combat. And by the way, there were a heck of a lot of military nurses, WOMEN, who served in Viet Nam, working their hearts out trying to save casualties of the that conflict. Now, WE are are still waiting for your list of "these people" you deem not deserving of civil rights.

By the way , kieth, since I served DURING the VIET NAM WAR, that makes me a VIET NAM WAR ERA VETERAN . Doesn't mean I served IN COMBAT. You get that, Viet Nam ERA Veteran! Just to make sure you see it... That's ERA, as in during the time of...... So THANK YOU VERY MUCH !!! And, you can come here to my house and call me a liar, that is if you have the nerve to say it to my face!!

You sound really angry.  I certainly hope those dogs you're breeding have more stable temperaments than you do.

Pardon me if I'm skeptical about your military service claims.  I tend to believe half of what I see and none of what I hear but hey, you can be anyone you want on the internets; right?  And yes, I was in the Army, an M.P. in the 3rd Armored Division.

I sense that you don't like me.  That will impact my life...well...not at all really.  I already have enough friends.

Now take your meds.

I found 3 more shiny pennies. lol

Read Article 3 Section 2 about Judicial Powers  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution

Then check this out   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

The Supreme Court never had "Judicial Review" powers !!

THEN I found this ....

"At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account." - Letter to Monsieur A. Coray, October 31, 1823

Read more: http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/quotes-by-thomas-jefferson.html#ixzz1zI7p5ihD