
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Carlin on 19 April 2014 - 14:04
Anyone want to get together to start a Pink Unicorn Church ?
As if you're not already a card-carrying member...

by Red Sable on 19 April 2014 - 15:04
To those who want some good coincidences ( which I don't believe in anymore) we have- the 4 blood moons (warning for the Jewish people) ALL following on Jewish holidays ( 2 on passover, and two of Sukkoth) - with a solar eclipse in the middle ( which is a warning to the world)
explained here:
http://www.pray4zion.org/TheComingBloodMoons.html
and we had:
The day after President Obama was elected the Chicago lottery winning numbers were 666, the following day they were 777 9.
I don't have to tell anyone what 666 stands for, 7 of course being the number of God and 9 being the number of judgement.

by GSDtravels on 19 April 2014 - 19:04
Of course you'll take a pass beetree, because, as usual, you're making $hit up again! You can't quote me because I didn't say that, now did I? Nice try to derail when you've explicitly stated you don't want to discuss the topic. Sorry, I don't go where you lead, play your game by yourself.
by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 19:04
I have not taken a pass. You as usual, only accept the answer you are looking for. The answer was simply: you are generally preachy. And, I don't need to live by your definitions. They are your revelations. Nice for you. While we are at it with the accusations, how about your own shortcomings? You never came back and told the great mystery you were working on up to, claiming, declaiming even! That it would bring Shtal, screaming to his knees with the ultimate logic you would evidence him with .... yada yada, I guess?
Funny, I knew the answer was "Pi", regardless of whatever it was that got you there. And your seven year old prodigy self, had all the answers! That's how it goes? What about your religious beliefs you offered up and never shared? Please, yourself, why don't you? And that degree question... never gets answered. LOL
by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 19:04
Oops wrong thread.... LOL

by Hundmutter on 19 April 2014 - 19:04
Carlin - you can't prove that, either !

by GSDtravels on 19 April 2014 - 20:04
Yet another derail. Funny how I'm asking you for your definition of a word in your question, yet you can turn that around to me providing the definition! That's precisely why I wanted you to clarify! Do you take anti-depressants?
by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 20:04
No need for a clarification. Open any dictionary that you have handy. Use that. Avoidance plus. Degree or None? Yep, that's what I thought. Never have you answered those past questions, when in contrast, so many of my posts clearly show me stating what I will do, before I actually do it. Remarkable, the transparency I foretell.
You, never. Just another accusation or baseless assertion, all couched up in effrontery.

by GSDtravels on 19 April 2014 - 20:04
Carlin, you misunderstand the reason many atheists use unicorns, fairies, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, etc.. They are not making fun, they are attempting to make you understand that when you say "You can't disprove God!" that it's no different than attempting to "disprove" unicorns, fairies, The Flying Spaghetti Monster, etc.. To which the typical reply is "Well, that's utterly ridiculous, we all know that those are fictional characters.", which is exactly the same way atheists feel about God and the Bible, they find it utterly ridiculous. They're trying to make their point crystal clear in terms that can be easily understood. Would you like certain laws based on what is written about the Leprechaun's instructions to find the gold and you'd have to follow those rules too? And these instructions must be followed to the letter and they have much to do with your behavior! Do you understand how ridiculous you see it that anyone could believe they could actually find a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow and the only way to get it is if you agree to it too? And it seems like so many people actually believe it and base their lives on that pot of gold! Would you ever be able to agree to that?? If your honest answer is no, the analogy worked.
And I know beetree will be more interested in my degree, because she thinks you need a PhD to understand simple logic. But she probably will pass on it anyway, it's too "preachy" for her taste :)
by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 20:04
You don''t know squat about what I am interested in. It can only be your guess. And just a diversion of your own part to avoid all those OUCH questions from the post above. Own it, why don't you? This is just getting too boring for me. Parsing will be the death of all good conversations, I am so convinced.
Pi! Pi! ... Let's have it! Everything I ever needed to know I learned as a seven year old... That is the story of your hours, I am sure I am not alone in breathless anticipation of such a tale!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top