We got our AKC title and high in trial! - Page 11

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

wlpool

by wlpool on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

Who said I didn't have permission?  I will have you know that I explained the situation BEFORE POSTING and he COMPLETELY understood my problem!
Yet another lie from an anonymous person, hmmmmm.


MaggieMae

by MaggieMae on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

.

Mystere

by Mystere on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

You certainly did not ask MY permission to post a pm.  

MaggieMae

by MaggieMae on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

.

by TessJ10 on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

"So......why the "selective" bashing of Windy over this AKC "HIT" Ribbon (and everything else but the "kitchen sink" that has been thrown at her)?"

Omg, can you really be that dense?  It's about the LYING.  She lied about the HIT being "High in Trial OVERALL"  That's what she posted and it simply isn't true. It was a LIE.  Then she LIED about "At his last AKC trial he was High in Trial; there were 122 working dogs in the trial."  He wasn't HIT over 122 working dogs.  That was another LIE.  She LIED about importing a "Champion" bitch when not only is that dog not a Champion, but at this time she has NO titles whatsoever.  So there's another LIE.  She LIED by adding the SG "title" to her dog's collection of "Magic" titles, when she knows that SG is not a title at all.  So there's another LIE. 

"Man, woman, married, single, family or not, anyone who is confused, ignorant, falsifying or just outright a lying sack of shit, needs to be corrected. It's not about jealousy, envy or anything else but being black and white with the facts. Why would we want noobs to read this crap and then do the same themselves?"



GSDtravels

by GSDtravels on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

I remember you saying that you told the man, AFTER THE FACT, that you had posted his information, and he was not a happy camper, just as stated!  I don't feel like digging for it, I have better things to do.   I'm also sure that it's been either deleted or edited, like so many of your posts.  This has gotten WAY past ridiculous!  I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt because of plain ignorance but you are now out and out lying and STILL attempting to justify and validate your position.  You are either not intelligent enough to understand third grade English, insane enough to expect that others believe things just because you say they're so, or so used to lying and getting away with it, you don't know what to do when actually caught.  Unbelievable!


by TessJ10 on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

"If someone's name, phone number, eMail address, etc., is already "out there" on the Web, it is no "big deal" to state it here."

Uh, yes it is.  I could find detailed personal information about anyone "out there on the Web," but I would never post that here or on other boards.  That just is not done.  It is NOT cool to do this at any time.

GSDtravels

by GSDtravels on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

And even if some people are breeding "untitled" dogs, at least they're not lying about it!  Where did VM advertise all of the non-existent titles her dog had (NOT) earned?  Please point the way to advert.  Until then, STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT!


4pack

by 4pack on 05 April 2010 - 21:04

Why would I not get all over VM for breeding untitled dog? Simple, I don't give a shit if someone breeds an untitled dog. I'm not Miss SV standards. A Sch title means very little to me. I have seen VM's dogs, they are nice, very driven, very strong dogs. Not the prettiest in my book but pretty is what I "am" willing to sacrafice before work ethic in a dog. VM's pups will have alot of potential for many things, sport, police, PPD, and probably much more. These are working dogs not glorified baby sitters, snot lickers, or couch holder downers.

I could care less if WP wants to breed her dog every heat cycle for pet homes but don't come claiming to the world that they are Champion sport or protection dogs of any sort. Anyone with any sport or protection dog background can watch her vdeos and see these dogs DON'T have what it takes. Why would their puppies?

GSD Travels, so glad you remember it as I do. I remember it because I thought, "man if you gave out my cell # on a forum, to prove a point, or try and dog yourslef out of a hole and I started getting calls from random people asking questions, I'd be livid."

Windy I clearly remember you saying you posted his #...then you called him to tell him that you did. If he was "not happy" about it in any way, why would you have still put it out there? Sure he understood why you did it! Mmmhhhhmmm.

by TessJ10 on 05 April 2010 - 21:04

I remember that, too.  Windy Pool did say on here that she posted, then told him about it, and he was not happy.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top