Orlando Shooting - Page 10

Also, in ot we really don't enforce topics part of the reason is we can't even keep you guys on topic in the dog forum. So, we are not about to do it ot.

From townhall.com


Bizarrely, racism in America is no longer mainly about race. Sure, race is involved in a peripheral manner, but racism has mainly become an excuse, a dodge, a way to escape responsibility.


When a black liberal is criticized, he cries racism. When liberalism fails, liberals cry racism. When the Democrat Party gets in trouble, liberals cry racism. It has become the ever present background noise of politics, like birds chirping in the forest.


Racism does still exist and always will, but once the Democrat Party joined the GOP in being opposed to racist policies, appealing to racism became a dead dog political loser in this country. The very fact that we've become so hypersensitive about it as a country is evidence of how far it has been pushed to the fringes.

Keep in mind that we live in a nation with a black President and a black Attorney General. Furthermore, the government is legally allowed to discriminate against white Americans based on the color of their skin and it happily does so; yet you can't go a day in this country without hearing liberals howling about what a racist country they live in. It has almost become a circular, faith-based argument. America is racist because so many liberals say it's racist because they've heard other liberals say the country is racist.

SEE ALSO: After Brexit: With Britain Filing For Divorce From EU, Others May Follow Suit

Well, if our country is so racist, why is it that the Left has to reach so far to find examples of racism? People didn’t have to do any reaching to find examples of racism in the fifties and sixties, did they? So, if racism is such an all powerful force in America today, how is it that liberals have gotten so desperate to see race in every issue

There was a really interesting article in the Guardian last Saturday (18 June) entitled "The wilful blindness of white America". The author is a BBC Presenter, Clive Myrie. He said:
"I arrived (in Washington Heights, Milwaukee) to chat about racism in the US, for a film in which I would only talk to white people. Most Americans are courteous. After a few minutes these were also candid. They were confessing to an outsider; I was like a neutral priest. "I'm part of the problem" CW told me...he said it was easy for him to avoid so-called Black America and fail to appreciate the privation, the struggles. "I don't know how to solve the problem, so what I do is ignore it, and yes a lot of people do that - it's much easier not to know". Later Myrie continues:
"What world is white America living in ? Surely the statistics say it all. Half of black Americans who are born poor stay poor; black students attend the worst schools; 1.6 millon black men aged 24-54 have disappeared from civic life because they have died or are in prison. If you are black in Milwaukee and earning $100k per annum, you'll be rejected for a mortgage as often as white people earning $200k pa are rejected. A black person with a college degree has less chance of finding a high-paying job than a white college drop-out. The socio-economic data is damning, Is white America blind, or playing dumb ?"
"In a tiny way my trip to Milwaukee made me realise just how easy it is to avoid the unpalatable in America, and to rely on a media too often interested more in ratings than explanation."
I expect the full article is on Guardian Online for anyone prepared to read it.

GSDAdmin: Just supporting a racist has to become reason to in some kind of subconsciense level mean that is okay with a person.

 

Prager: So you are actually accusing Joan that she is subconsciously a racist?  That is anew one on me. Also can you show me where she attacked   Arabs. Of course Arabs are not race.

In my opinion there is only one species .  But anthropologically a human race is defined as a group of people with certain common inherited features that distinguish them from other groups of people. All men of whatever race are currently classified by the anthropologist or biologist as belonging to the one species, Homo sapiens.

Anthropologically and there only 3 or at most 4 races Arabs are in the same white people in Caucasian  group with    whites.  

• Caucasian races (Aryans, Hamites, Semites)- Arabs are in this group thus they are caucausian like Joan 
• Mongolian races (northern Mongolian, Chinese and Indo-Chinese, Japanese and Korean, Tibetan, Malayan, Polynesian, Maori, Micronesian, Eskimo, American Indian),
• Negroid races ( Negroid is not insult but scientific term used in anthropology) (African, Hottentots, Melanesians/Papua, , Australian Aborigine, Dravidians, Sinhalese)
• some separate Australian Aborigine, then define them as  Australoid. 

 Thus Arabs are Caucasians. Term racism does hardly applies here even if it would be true that Joan said that she hates Arabs. Which I do not think she has.  

 

 

@GSDadmin What goes to my "stance on immigration"? What do you think is my "stance on immigration"?

I have not typed the letters to spell Arab in any posts. I believe, from reading admin's previous ant-trump posts,that he deems everyone who would vote for trump is a racist...through association, and not giving a thought or consideration that many people are voting for him to prevent Hillery from be coming prez.
Lyin' Hillery should be tried for treason along with the current administration and lyin' ryan.

Arabs can be of any race. It is considered more of a cultural affiliation than a racial or ethnic one. Muhammad said anyone who speaks Arabic is an Arab. Here's a little hint, ask Arabs who is considered an Arab.

I'll ask anthropologist.

And you'll get the same answer as mine.

'The FBI has also dismissed the claim of a man identified publicly as “Miguel,” who claimed to have engaged in sexual relations with Mateen in an interview with Univisión, as “not credible.” “Miguel” told Univisión that Mateen committed his act of terror out of “revenge against Puerto Ricans” after engaging in a ménage à trois with two Puerto Rican men, one who allegedly was HIV positive. TMZ has reported that the FBI has picked up surveillance video footage from a hotel “Miguel” claims to have visited with Mateen; the LA Times report indicated that what they found on that footage was enough to deem “Miguel”‘s account not credible. The LA Times describes the FBI as dismissing the other men who claim to have encountered Mateen on dating sites as either “not credible” or “confus[ing] Mateen with someone else,” that allowance of error not present regarding the man interviewed by Univisión.'

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/24/fbi-no-evidence-omar-mateen-gay/