
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by joanro on 02 January 2015 - 00:01

by bubbabooboo on 02 January 2015 - 01:01
Instinct can be modified by environment and it does not take a human to modify animal behavior. The arrogance and stupidity of humans is breath taking in the scope and depths that it can project human attributes or lack thereof as a measurement of intelligence or lack of intelligence. Crows use tools, have a language, teach their offspring about dangerous people, and can pass knowledge between generations or if you wish have an oral history. Dogs, cats, and many other animals have destroyed the arrogant scientist who say only primates can do these tasks as they have been proven wrong. It is the stupidity of humans that has been proven and our inability to see other animals as intelligent beings is the proof positive of our stupidity. We now know that many animals use tools and can pass this knowledge on to the next generation. It is not instinct, it is learned knowledge copied and passed between individuals and passed between generations. The Biblical concept of dominion seems to be wishful thinking by the writers of the Bible and other religious texts expousing man's superiority over animals and our right to use and abuse the animals that we should be protecting from ourselves.

by Mike D on 02 January 2015 - 01:01
Joan,
Yes instinct can be modified by training. No the training can not be passed on to later generations. There is research going on showing how environment can cause changes in DNA. It is not yet known how this affects genes and genetics.
Boo said:
"have destroyed the arrogant scientist who say only primates can do these tasks"
Boo can you show an instance where a scientist has been dissapointed in discovering the learning abilities of the organisms they study?
Mike
by vk4gsd on 02 January 2015 - 01:01
here is some of the general science in laymen's terms;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenerational_epigenetics
by joanro on 02 January 2015 - 02:01
BTW, isn't training, environment?
Bub, I was talking about hunting/stalking instinct used in herding and in pointing dogs.

by Mike D on 02 January 2015 - 04:01
"selection for the desired modifiable instincts influences what's inherited"
Yep I agree.
Training = environment? Yes I agree with that too-and as I said there is research (the epigenetics that vk referenced) that shows
how environment can cause changes in DNA. I think the jury is still out on if these changes are heritable changes in genes. It will be
an interesting field of study to follow.
Mike

by BlackMalinois on 02 January 2015 - 11:01
Wrong genetics you can,t repair with training !!!
Its the dumb and bad selecting dogs and litters from the human who created bad quality of GSD today.
People who are playing for GOD but they don,t know what they are doing they think knowing better
than mother nature.........................and look where we are always the human who destroy nature.
by Blitzen on 02 January 2015 - 12:01
A query for those who have bred one or more litters of GSD's. Those who have never bred a litter of GSD's or who don't even own a GSD, need not respond please.
1. What was your criteria for determining the breed worthiness of the sire/s and dam/s of your litter/s?
2. How many generations of your own breeding exists and what have those dogs accomplished in the big picture?
by joanro on 02 January 2015 - 12:01

by Sunsilver on 02 January 2015 - 13:01
Bubba, the word the King James version translates as 'dominion' actually means, in the original language something much closer to 'stewardship'.
Just sayin'....I think He would be pretty disappointed with our version of 'stewardship'!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top