RAW FED PUPS VS. KIBBLE FED PUPS- PICTURES - Page 10

The yellow lab is 14 years old, and you guessed it - ate Old Roy, great coat and condition and nary a health problem.

This boxer isn't old, but he has the most gorgeous shiny coat you ever would see.  Practically reflects light off his body.  He has been eating science diet corn-based food since he was a puppy.

One of my females only a week after whelping a litter, 6 years old.  Gorgeous coat and condition, easy whelp and recovery - always fed kibble food.

There seems to be comprehension problems.  I didn't say this was a raw feeders only thread.  What I said was pro raw feeding, and if you have followed the thread from the last one on the raw fed litter, you would understand it was started by someone who feels raw is more beneficial, who started a separate thread because the "wow my raw fed litter" thread was hijacked by "my kibble is better" posts.  I cannot teach comprehension, I can only advise people to re-read until they understand the underlying objective.

Secondly, Molly, your lack of detail just makes your above post/reply seem evasive and baseless.  You seem to be regurgitating the same thoughts just phrasing them differently every time you post. 

Once again, you cannot "try" to feed raw for 1 week, or 3 weeks, or a year if you are feeding it incorrectly.  And some premade raw diets are just like kibble, and should be avoided...not because of a lack of balance, BUT BECAUSE OF A LACK OF QUALITY, LACK OF KNOWLEDGE BY THE MANUFACTURER, AND ADDITION OF FILLERS TO SAVE $$$ because it is a business.

If you had negative results, it is more than likely due to human error.  I (and others who haven't beed disgusted enough to stop reading this thread) would be happy to help you figure out and fix your "human error" if you would like to post a detailed account of how you fed, and what you fed.

If you cannot provide details, I (and probably others) cannot attempt to help you. 

No, thank you.  

I have no interest in breaking what works for me and my dogs.

Quote: One of my females only a week after whelping a litter, 6 years old.  Gorgeous coat and condition, easy whelp and recovery - always fed kibble food.

What a liar you are. Where the hell are her tits ? Did she have a litter or not ? Doesn't look like it to me. Did the typhoid she contracted from the chicken poop cause a c-section to remove the dead or something ? What a sack of shit lying like that. That bitch did not have any pups within a week.

Dog looks like a blimp, too. Odd that the kibble wasn't enough nutrition for her to make milk.

       FWIW..I see tits  teats on that female...: ) 

                    

This is hilarity like I have never seen on this board. We have those who think they are some kind of genius who cannot read the words on the page, those who think bigger is better (and healthier), those who think because they cannot wrap their heads around how to feed a dog raw food without causing explosive diarrhea, and flat out liars. Is this a great forum, or what?!

And here is my grandfather, who smoked 7 packs per day and only ate fast food. Doesn't he look fantastic and youthful?! 


And here is his twin brother, who works out 7 days per week and hasn't had a carb since the late 60's and only eats organic food. 

how YOU doin' gramps?  yeah ;)  hit me up some time. 

maybe we should start a new thread on kibble vs. raw tits?  owners who feed kibble, please post a pic of yours, and raw feeders do the same. 

    OOps...I meant to sat teats....I am so embarrassed...