
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Don Dildo on 16 January 2010 - 23:01
"a gate"? Per Molly, it was an habitual occurrence:
What A Country - Homeward bound -2
by eichenluft on 13 January 2010 - 20:01
eichenluft
Posts: 2446
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 06:19 pm
OH, and the board monies for the last week of having her dogs here, is because I fired her from cleaning kennels after "the last straw was broken" - Shelley left so many gates open I lost count. One time causing a bitch fight (my two females) another time causing a loose boarder (I live on a busy road, gates cannot be left open for any reason). Other gates open caught in time (by me) to avert another crisis. Then I let dogs out only to discover my stud dog in the small-dog yard with two small dog (boarders) (gate between yards left open by Shelley). He could have seriously injured or killed them, and may have if they had confronted him or I hadn't been right there.
But just because Molly posted this on the internet doesn't make it true, just as none of us can know whether Shelley was actually abused - the simple fact is none of the rest of us were there for these events. So it's only fair that Shelley have a chance to weigh in at some point, once she is settled.
The other issue here that no one has yet recognized is that both these women are dog breeders who rely upon the PDB as part of their sales base. Damaged reputations aren't exactly helpful when it comes to selling dogs. So there's a lot more riding on this than whose fan club is bigger or more vocal, and it's a significant part of why I suggested that Shelley follow up on this, when she is able to.

by MaggieMae on 17 January 2010 - 00:01
Back off; no explanation is owed to you nor anyone for that matter.
by Don Dildo on 17 January 2010 - 00:01
I do, however, find it interesting that you could seemingly care less that Molly's reputation has been harmed by this Geblaut person.
I also notice you neglected to continue the discussion about the gate that you started. Why is that?

by MaggieMae on 17 January 2010 - 00:01
Give it up -- go away.
by beetree on 17 January 2010 - 03:01
by Don Dildo on 17 January 2010 - 05:01
Your non-response is all the answer anyone needs as to your impartiality, Maggie. Might as well just break out the pom-poms and forget about appearances.
"You are wrong."
I never said Shelley wasn't abused, so there's nothing for me to be wrong - or right - about.

by MaggieMae on 17 January 2010 - 06:01

by steve1 on 17 January 2010 - 07:01
Maggie
i have said it now several times it is not ours to Judge Molly or Shelley it is nothing to do with us on here including Tiger, DD and Raymond
All three never participate in any dogs threads to note but sling the muck on these sort of threads
Raymond has a fixation on me and that is not healthy so i really do wonder about him and i guess many more are, better to concentrate on working your Dog or be with the Girls matey, not on Guys
Steve1

by Mystere on 17 January 2010 - 07:01

by steve1 on 17 January 2010 - 07:01
Yes, i guess it is night over there now so today your time she should be there and that will be great, but once this thread dies there will be another mud sling one to follow that is certain it is a trait on this forum for some to want to do it
Steve1
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top