
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Ibrahim on 27 December 2009 - 21:12
bazza,
I read the thread starting at top and I started having questions, same as yours and was going to write down almost what you said. One of the things I like about you is that you dig deep and search previous history which is good when a thread is strange.
DebiSue was nice enough to critique the (Animal) as called by the OP which sounded to me as an exclamation mark not a real request for opinions.

by AmbiiGSD on 27 December 2009 - 22:12
The picture has been posted out of pure spite.
Like the people that don't automatically assume the worst - I'd like to see this dog with it's coat not shaven.
edit:
Didn't take much doing to find this dogs pedigree
www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/pedigree/607848.html
by VomMarischal on 28 December 2009 - 02:12
by freemont on 02 January 2010 - 19:01
This "animal" is a SHINING EXAMPLE of why this breed is dooooooooooooooooomed.
Freemont.
by dutss on 04 January 2010 - 12:01
If I were you I would go back and edit my language....then you MAY be taken seriouisly.

by kkalligher on 04 January 2010 - 20:01

by kkalligher on 04 January 2010 - 20:01

by CrysBuck25 on 05 January 2010 - 01:01
I was just wondering. English is obviously not your first language, though you wrote fairly well, but your use of the words are perfectly spelled and used, leading me to wonder the above.
No insult intended, but your link is blank and the only photo visible of the dog in question is the one posted at the top of this thread, and that is not a flattering picture at all.
If this dog is as beautiful as you say, please post a good picture of the dog on this thread, to counteract the statements of the original poster. I'd like to see this dog with a coat.
Crys
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top