CANINE SEIZURES

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by MaggieMae on 20 December 2009 - 09:12

There are several people on this forum who "cut and paste" -- some just just put up videos or a picture; if that bothers "some" people, at least they should be "an equal opportunity Basher" and harass everyone equally.

by bazza on 20 December 2009 - 09:12

Difference is this lot of cut and paste is getting ridiculous, and of little value. Maggie why would you assume it bothers anyone if people cut and paste occaisionally? Who said that? It can be a good tool if used correctly, no doubt. You my dear ASSUME far too much about others here sadly.

by MaggieMae on 20 December 2009 - 09:12

Bazza -- You are "full of it."   Their are so many hypocrites on this Board that it is laughable. I get a lot of crap from 4/5 people -- the "clique" -- that I don't post anything substantive about dogs.   So I've been looking at the Posting List of several people -- including you -- and 99.9% of the posts are on the OT's.   Talking about the Pot calling the Kettle Black.
So we will all have to agree to disagree.   However, "stalking" I will not tolerate and will pursue the matter.

I said IF it bothers..... "IF"    I didn't "assume" anything.

by bazza on 20 December 2009 - 11:12

So you've been checking me out, glad you find me so interesting. That too could be classed as stalking. You won't tolerate? And just who do you think you are? Persue away my sweet you do not scare anyone you silly little girl, lol. If commenting on someones thread is now classed as stalking what the hell is the point of posting in the first place, and by the way you have NEVER posted anything worth reading about GSDS full stop. And, yes you do ASSUME, every time you open that large gaping whole beneath your nose, you ASSUME.
Bazza-- you are " full of it", now that you have got right...... but my "it" is most definately not your "it" on that we will have to agree to disagree my little cherub!!!!

by MaggieMae on 20 December 2009 - 11:12

The person that I was addressing above knows exactly what I am talking about. You then posted and accused me of being the biggest stalker, without knowing any background of the situation. I was not addressing you in my post above. Also, I was not just checking you out -- I was looking at several Posters' postings -- the majority were to the OT threads.
Now I have not come on here insulting you; apparently, you are trying to pick an argument with me. I would rather not get into a verbal back and forth with you. I hope the rest of your day goes better.

by bazza on 20 December 2009 - 12:12

I use the name BAZZA, you mentioned the name BAZZA, is there another using this name BAZZA? If not then you did address me, if there is another BAZZA then i ask your forgiveness. You could not insult me even although you try, how can i be insulted by an anonymous entity?
You did say you had checked out posters INCLUDING ME, so again you were addressing me, i cannot speak for the others. Now there is no way in hell you will agree, as you just can't see it, but if the person you are calling a stalker then you are also, FACT. I do not wish an arguement with you or anyone, why does it always have to be an arguement, is it because that is what you do best and is all you are really here for? I like to call it a debate, that's healthier, but you would not know how to debate.
So finally if you are not addressing me do not use the name BAZZA in your posts, and this is not the first time you have. I too hope the rest of your day goes well, if you can draw yourself away from stalking everyone you have taken a dislike to it just might happen my little cup cake.

by MaggieMae on 20 December 2009 - 12:12

by George the Retard on 20 December 2009 - 16:12

gag-me

if i was stalking you then why this comment.

The "sock puppets" have returned.

i did not address you i posted before you so then that makes you the stalker.

why dont you take your stupidity someplace else.

i have never stalked anyone anywhere so again take a flying leap.

this statement makes no sense to me

The person that I was addressing above knows exactly what I am talking about.

if you are saying i know what you are talking about i will have to disagree i am not a mind reader.

now gag-me quit following me around you stalker.

GTR

by Mystere on 20 December 2009 - 18:12

SSDD Rather than come on her, as usual, to pick fights and be nasty, you should probably really look into this DOG-RELATED topic for once, given (suspected) the bloodline of your show-line dog. Put your time to more productive use. I have had a gsd with seizures and thought,perhaps, there was a discussion to which I might contribute something helpful to someone else. But, no. It is just Kim Rall cutting and pasting (Good suggestion, Bazza) and MaggieMae doing her usual.

by MaggieMae on 20 December 2009 - 23:12

Mystere -- I wouldn't go there if I were you......believe me, I've heard plenty about you. I have never "called you out" in a post until now and that is only because of your post above. If you want to carry on with it, I'm game.

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

CANINE SEIZURES - Page 2

Pedigree Database