This is a placeholder text
Group text
by TessJ10 on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
"Tess. If you are Don -- which I think is either you or Jim -- then yes, you are prying. "
But since I'm not, then, as always, MaggieMae, you are wrong. Wrong again. (LOL) How many times is this now? Oh, yeah, as many times almost as you have posts. It's hard to fish without bait, isn't it? ROTFL - keep casting that line, Maggie!
But since I'm not, then, as always, MaggieMae, you are wrong. Wrong again. (LOL) How many times is this now? Oh, yeah, as many times almost as you have posts. It's hard to fish without bait, isn't it? ROTFL - keep casting that line, Maggie!
by JRANSOM on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Wow. This thread has gone bad! Ramond, c'mon. If you can tell Shelley one thing from your POV, then surely Steve1 can tell her from his. Now get over it and just wish her well and quit your bickering!
by Don Dildo on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Geblaut - if you truly have this material and seek for Shelley to receive continued support from those who might be wavering after reading Molly's posts, then what is holding you back from posting it directly?
Also, your link doesn't provide any information, but just goes to a password-required portal page.
Also, your link doesn't provide any information, but just goes to a password-required portal page.
by TessJ10 on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Geblaut, I for one have no desire to see those emails, as titillating as they may be. This is getting too nasty even for this pdb, and for A to take B's emails to C and post them publicly is pretty low. Same for anyone who would have personal emails from Shelley to any third person and post them - low blow. Please don't. You would be posting emails not to/from you, but to/from other people.
by mobjack on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Whatever has transpired between Molly and Shelley is THEIR business to resolve or not.
But that should be done privately between the two of them.
Sad to see it has come to this.
But that should be done privately between the two of them.
Sad to see it has come to this.
by Don Dildo on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Tess, Geblaut claims to have evidence and has used that claim to portray Molly's character as far less than honorable.
So this isn't a matter of titillation, but rather for Geblaut to either put up or shut up.
So this isn't a matter of titillation, but rather for Geblaut to either put up or shut up.
by MaggieMae on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Pot - Kettle
by Geblaut on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Dildo (how appropriate)
Reread the post. My intention is NOT to publish the rubbish in those emails, just to make people aware that there is a lot more to this than meets the eye. Those emails and contracts WILL be addressed in another venue.
Reread the post. My intention is NOT to publish the rubbish in those emails, just to make people aware that there is a lot more to this than meets the eye. Those emails and contracts WILL be addressed in another venue.
by JudyK on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
Okay folks, how about calling a truce. This thread has sunk into the gutter. Regardless of what people think about the situation I'm sure everyone wishes Shelley well and let's all hope and pray that she arrives safely and well before that litter hits the ground.
No flaming please.
No flaming please.
by Don Dildo on 13 January 2010 - 23:01
What venue will that be?
And regardless of what transpired between the two, do you really think you helped Shelley's cause by coming on here and attacking her host - who had refrained from any commentary about the situation until you posted about it?
And regardless of what transpired between the two, do you really think you helped Shelley's cause by coming on here and attacking her host - who had refrained from any commentary about the situation until you posted about it?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top