
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Mithuna on 09 March 2016 - 06:03
As we move around the web there seem to be a distinct dichotomy about the wider community's perception of the working dog ( GSD ). On the one hand there is the prey driven equipment oriented dog; his drive allow him to bring power to the work, but he is very much fixated on the training equipment. On the other hand is the more balanced dog , with strong suspicion and civil orientation. The former has been called a sport dog, and the latter a real dog.
Is your dog like the one in the picture below? He is waiting for the prey item in the snowman's hand to move.
by vk4gsd on 09 March 2016 - 06:03
The internet is not the wider community so i didnt read any further.
How's your training going?

by Mithuna on 09 March 2016 - 07:03
Health wise shes doing fine, and we are making some progress on obedience exercises; other than that she's a rough character to those she don't know ( been like that since 6 months old ). She maxes out from the first instant, once you're not one of her homies. In the house shes a darling, settles nicely , and every night she and my wife races up the steps ( bed time race ) to see who can dive onto the bed first.
Here she is ( tonight after the park ) kind of getting too big for the back seat of the car ( and of course we no longer have a clean car window).
by vk4gsd on 09 March 2016 - 07:03

by Mithuna on 09 March 2016 - 07:03
Vk
I did recently visit a friend with a titled dog , and all the while I moved about the property and house the dog had zero interest in me or where I went ; the dog just say quietly all the while. I asked my friend about and his only reply was that he likes a " mellow" dog.

by Markobytes on 09 March 2016 - 13:03
by joanro on 09 March 2016 - 14:03
As long as you have her under control..... she is what she is, and very fortunate to have you, mithuna, as her owner.

by Sunsilver on 09 March 2016 - 14:03
REALLY, Markobytes? Come on, what's the #1 thing people test a dog for these days when selecting for schutzhund/sport, or even, God help us, law enforcement?? Come on, you all know this: BALL DRIVE!! And we wonder WHY we get dogs that are fixated on the equipment, not the decoy?
If we really wanted civil dogs, we need to go back to the days of William Kohler, and test the dog's reaction to what he calls a 'sneak': someone dressed in strange, baggy clothing, and acting in a suspicious manner.
You get what you select for...no one should be suprised at that!
A few years ago, our club had 5 dogs at a trial. Out of the 5, there was ONE dog who reacted to our regular decoy when he wasn't wearing a sleeve. It was a Carmspack dog, and they breed dog for law enforcement, amongst other things.
http://www.carmspack.com/our-record/
Re: selecting for ball drive:
I watched the TV show about von Liche kennels, and yup, that's what they did.
I also remember reading a story about a police officer selecting a new dog - again, he chose the one that had the strongest drive to find the ball he hid in a large field. Hey, that's great if you're training a drug or bomb dog, but this dog was going to work on the street.
I have a friend who used to be the manager of an animal shelter. She had a young adult GSD come in that no one seemed to want. She asked a LEO to evaluate her as a possible police dog. He tested her ball drive, and when she didn't show enough drive to suit him, he said he didn't want her.
Now, here's the sad part. My friend took the dog home, so she could do a more serious evaluation of her temperment under different situations. Remember, this is a young dog that no one had bothered to train, and God only knows how she was treated by her former owners. My friend was standing at the fence, talking to her neighbour, and the dog saw him as a threat and went for him.
She was euthanized the same day.
With selection criteria other than ball drive, and the proper training from a young age, this dog might have been just what a law enforcement officer needed.

by Markobytes on 09 March 2016 - 14:03

by Sunsilver on 09 March 2016 - 14:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top