
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by SitasMom on 06 July 2011 - 06:07
How much money did Washington recently spend to train Chinese prostitutes to drink more responsibly on the job? (Choose one.) - I'll help........
Incredibly, Washington is spending $2.6 million training Chinese prostitutes to drink more responsibly on the job. This is the kind of wasteful spending that President Obama and Congress have stubbornly refused to cut. Instead, they planned to raise taxes on families and entrepreneurs by trillions of dollars! Only action by citizens like you will break the Washington liberals of this kind of frivolous splurging.
by keepthefaith on 07 July 2011 - 19:07
A little research would have revealed some additional information: namely it was under George Bush that the funding was approved
http://prognosis.med.wayne.edu/article/grant-allows-research-to-study-link-between-alcohol-abuse-and-spread-of-hiv
Yes, we know that your concern is spending - no matter who is the president - but rather than cite President Obama and Congress, you should have pointed out that it was approved under Bush!

by Slamdunc on 07 July 2011 - 21:07

by BabyEagle4U on 07 July 2011 - 22:07
LOL @ Bush.
Yep folks, this is a once in a lifetime opportunity. For the 3rd straight year the US Government has been running up a deficit of 1 (one) Trillion dollars. That's 12 zero's to the left of the decimal or 1 (one) thousand billion. Cute number huh ?
No country in the history of the world has ever for 3 straight years (even) ran up a deficit of 1 trillion dollars. Can't blame Bush for that.
Interesting to note.. China for the first time has become the NET seller of US Treasury Bonds. Ruh Roh, what does that mean Shaggy ? That means grab a front row seat and enjoy the expolsion because the Bond BUBBLE is about to POP !!!
Meanwhile, anyone hear about the first time Chinese delegate to attend the 2011 Bilderberg Conference ? Evidently he was sent there to reiterate China's warning in person to the heads of US Government .. any more planned attacks on Pakistan and China will interpret it as an act of aggression against Beijing. Or something like that, I of course paraphrased.
Ohhh no Shaggy, you can't be cereal. LMAO
It is what it is.

by BabyEagle4U on 07 July 2011 - 22:07

by Mindhunt on 08 July 2011 - 00:07

by zmoderator on 09 July 2011 - 06:07
Please take a few moments to go back to all the threads you have started that appear on the first page of this forum and add the appropriate links and credit the authors.
Thanks for your understanding and cooperation
-zmod
by SitasMom on 09 July 2011 - 18:07
Who said I liked Bush?
by keepthefaith on 09 July 2011 - 21:07
No one said you liked Bush - but when you provide a news item that specifically relates to Bush's presidency why bring up Obama in that context when it has nothing to do with him?
The right wing website that are the sole source of your knowledge had this specific news item but they conveniently omitted that it occurred under Bush ........... but they were counting on the "ditto-heads" to lap it up, which they did hook, line and sinker!

by Myracle on 09 July 2011 - 22:07
The spending cited was frivilous CONSERVATIVE spending.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top