Defense drive or Prey drive - Page 13

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

4pack

by 4pack on 08 July 2007 - 02:07


by Get A Real Dog on 08 July 2007 - 03:07

Is anyone going to answer Sunshine's question?


by Jeff Oehlsen on 08 July 2007 - 12:07

So my answer wasn't definitive enough??? LOL

Preston, I do not want you to stop posting, I want you to use paragraphs.

I would have to see the dogs you are talking about. I have had some very very serious dogs in my lifetime, and while it would be ok to go through that again if I was going to start breeding again, I am good without the hassles.

One of the interesting things with dogs that seem to not have fear, is that they do not show it AS MUCH as other dogs. It is there, and it is why they will go forward with aggression. To say that a dog has no fear is silly, gangster or not. Of course the whole use of the word gangster is a bad choice, cause everyone of those people show fear aggression. Why do they pack up??? Ever come across one by himself??? Runs like a little kid gonna tell his daddy. Bad choice, naughty Preston. LOL


DesertRangers

by DesertRangers on 08 July 2007 - 16:07

If Preston does not understand by now he never will...........


by gsdlvr2 on 08 July 2007 - 23:07

Here's a thought for your consideration. Suppose both points of view are correct. Example..if Preston's backround is in clinical psychology or what ever he said it was..maybe his definition of fearless comes from the perspective of someone who is used to reading people alot , from looking in their eyes and their expressions and gaining experience in that respect and add to that the results seen. A mental definition of fearless which would be radically different from a physical /medical of definintion fear even though there is a commonality. Some people use the words fearless and full of courage interchangably. Neither is wrong. Perhaps both are right. I would find this very common among people whose jobs require that they do read people and read them quickly, sometimes for their own safety...Doctors, paramedics, nurses,social workers etc. After a while it becomes instinct. It translates into reading dogs also, at least for me it does. Now, on the other side of the coin are the people whose experience stems mostly from reading dogs from years of experience in training them. Their definition is more from a viewpoint of 'this is what I have experienced over the years, therefore it is true' . Maybe they have no experience on the other side of the coin, maybe they do, odds are their strength is only on the one side of the coin, in opposition , to some degree, to the first example but not in a bad way just..different. Add to that the results seen. Then you have those who have a viewpoint coming from a strictly scientific view.....example...if an animal has an adrenal gland it is capable of fear because it produce adrenaline, case closed. Another perspective. Not wrong, different. Add to that the results seen. Just some thoughts.

DesertRangers

by DesertRangers on 09 July 2007 - 00:07

Naw..Preston is an educated idiot who has no clue about dogs.  I have never know a human being who had no fear..Some have lower levels and takes more to stimulate them but everyone has fear. Humans can reason past fear while dogs cannot do so, you can condition and help them but you cannot reason with a dog and make him not fear.


by Jeff Oehlsen on 09 July 2007 - 03:07

Quote:  Here's a thought for your consideration.

Suppose both points of view are correct. Example..if Preston's backround is in clinical psychology or what ever he said it was..maybe his definition of fearless comes from the perspective of someone who is used to reading people alot , from looking in their eyes and their expressions and gaining experience in that respect and add to that the results seen. A mental definition of fearless which would be radically different from a physical /medical of definintion fear even though there is a commonality. Some people use the words fearless and full of courage interchangably. Neither is wrong. Perhaps both are right.

Here is a thought for your consideration.

Either words have a definition or they do not. Try Websters. Also, trust me, as I could care less, dogs show fear.


by workingdawg on 09 July 2007 - 03:07

Preston quote: First of all there are no scientific studies concluding that all GSDs or GSDs as a breed experience fear, or for that matter all dogs or all animals.

there is alots of studies that conclude that all animals (on planet earth) can and do experience fear. I'm not going to post them on this board because many of these studies are very large and take up to much space. but if anyone wants them (preston) i can send them to you by e-mail just email me tpd2654@yahoo.com. some are from Penn state and i also know some people from cornell that have some good stuff on stresses and fear.

there is also lots of studies that conclude all forms of aggression are fear based. if anyone wants that info let me know. (preston)

i will warn anyone that is interested in this info that it can be hard reading do to the fact it's so dry.

unless your gsd is not a animal or not from this planet then it does experience fear. i will go even farther and say they experiences fear on a day to day basis.

my experience of you (preston) is very cut and dry. you love and think the world of your gsds so much that you are blind to the facts.  the facts are  that your gsds and everyone elses are just like every other animal on this planet and do experience fear. it's natural, it's survival, it's ok that they do experience fear or else we would not have dogs. i don't believe you were ever very successful at training dogs, and maybe have never titled a dog from puppy through sch3 ( at least not with any great success) i get this from your post (i could be wrong but probly not) I'm not knocking you if you haven't trained a dog. it's tough and quiet frankly some people can't do it. i think this is why you lean more twards the show ring with dogs. the training in the ring does not demand complex behaviour but still is very work demanding (conditioning/running). now you have aquirred a very detailed eye for structure, but regardless of how detailed your eye is you cannot glance into the eye of a dog and tell his temperment and that he has no fear.

to me you can only tell a dogs true temperment by training the dog and testing the dog (trials). the true temperment of a dog cannot be judged in one moment or one day. it should be judged on a compilation of many days and many years of training. i base this on the fact that ever time i work my dog i learn something new about my dog and our relationship.

so in short preston, i don't believe you have a clue about correct temperment. if i have a question about structure you would be my man, but not temperment or workablity.


darylehret

by darylehret on 09 July 2007 - 08:07

Anyone intrested in studies in emotion or cognition from a biological perspective (rather than psychological) should read some of the works of neuroscientist Joseph LeDoux, who presents his research in a way that is not at all hard reading, or "dry".


All animals have to be able to detect and respond to danger, regardless of the kind of cognitive architecture they have. This is as true of bees and worms and snails, as it is of fish, frogs, birds, rats, and people. Fear conditioning, by the way, occurs in all animals.  ~Joseph LeDoux


GSDfan

by GSDfan on 09 July 2007 - 11:07


Sorry for getting off topic folks, this is just a reply to Jeff Oehlsen
 
Quote:
"I just see so many people throwin out THERAPY dog as a title like they accomplished something. What ?????? Your dog doesn't bite old people in wheelchairs and can be out in public?????? THAT IS SO AMAZING! ! ! ! ! ! ! !"
 
LOL, you crack me up!
 
Quote:
“Is it really perfect balance???”
 
Yes it IS a perfect balance, its not just OB. On Therapy visits he is not just aloof and tolerant; he’s social, acknowledging the person who is petting him. By no means an annoying mushy Lab type and does not overtly seek attention but looks up, smiles (yes smiles) and wags his tail at the attention giver.  
 
AND…When he was Temperament tested by the GSDCA (I KNOW you probably think that test is a joke too) but the evaluator said “You have a VERY nice dog there, he is the highest scoring and best dog I’ve seen today, this is what a German Shepherd SHOULD be.”
 
So you’re tellin’ me that having a Canine Good Citizen cert, Therapy Dog cert, Temperament cert, BH and a Breed survey does not prove that he has a good temperament??? Well it does to most people
 
On the other end… I certainly would like to “test” him more (although he’s always been very pronounced I understand SchH protection only show’s so much, and he apparently knows “what’s up”) alright maybe I just want to play (hidden sleeves, muzzles and bitesuits) but am having a hard time finding someone to appease me and am not paying big bucks for private training (one PT quoted me $500….only $50 per hr. but minimum of 10 sessions, paid up front).
 
 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top