This is a placeholder text
Group text
by missbeeb on 05 March 2009 - 17:03
It IS good news! Well done!
by funky munky on 05 March 2009 - 17:03
by Sue B on 05 March 2009 - 17:03
Panzerhund, Now you cant get better Banana advise than from a Munky Funky or otherwise..lol
Hey Liz (FM), wonder if panzer has ever tried turning his furry bananas upside down to see what they might remind him of then? lol
Regards
Sue
by Mackenzie on 05 March 2009 - 19:03
Hello Sue
Thank you for your post.
When I spoke of “openly” I was referring to the spokesmen for the three principle Clubs, but I am sure that you took that in. In which case I am surprised that you find difficulty with that. In an earlier post by Paul Rattigan he said, when talking about our leaders “THEIR SILENCE IS DEAFENING”. Your reference to my being open seems to me that you still have not comprehended that from my first post I have used my real identity. When you came to the back door to find out my identity by asking if I was Neil Johnson I responded by saying that I was not that person. Why should I pander to you when my real identity has always been in the open?
Your next comment “who do you mean when you say” We must get more etc, etc, it cannot be clearer. You know as well as I do, if not better, who the individuals are.
Your assistance to David and Mo are commendable. In fact, I have said, but not here, that I thought your article was good. On this note, I have said to David in an e-mail that if I could be of assistance please let me know and I will do all that I can to assist.
Your question, “what is it I am asking us to do?” is quite clear from earlier posts and I am not going to expand on that here.
With regard to the “smart arse” comment, that is exactly what your cherry picked response was in reply to my post. An objective response to the whole of the post would be better, even if you were not in agreement. My response put the matter into perspective but you have not replied specifically to the questions. Names are not needed for obvious reasons.
Finally, like you I am not on here 24/7.
by Sue B on 05 March 2009 - 20:03
Actually Mackenzie you are wrong when you say I would have taken IN your Openly comment as refering to spokesment for the three principle Clubs, I did not take it as that, so you presumed wrongly, which is one of the problems with messages on this board. As for accusing me of Cherry Picking my reply, sorry didnt realise there was a set format for a reply and actually didnt mean it in a Smart Arse kind of way, a second problem with this message board, for without the tone of voice one can often misinterpret what was meant. I was infact giving a positive reply to your post of WHO WILL by saying those posting on here WILL. In other words we DO NOT NEED those who are unwilling to give responses when we have those that are willing. So in my way of thinking it was YOU who chose to give the smart arse reply.
As for sending you a PM, I do not consider that the BACK DOOR as you put it, the reason I sent you that PM should have been obviously, but then again unlike you I do not go around Willie Nillie DROPPING the names of others on this board. I am not privvy to email conversations you have had with David Payne and to my knowledge David did NOT inform me of your communication regarding your thoughts on my article, so all I will say is that as far as I am concerned you know who I am but I still do not know who you are and even though I have discreetly enquired directly to you (which you prefer to call the Back Door) you have not had the courtesy to introduce yourself.
I have old catalogues and books handed down to me from Nelle Wright in which no Mackenzie features as an exhibitor, so forgive me for been scepticle of your identity but unfortunately thats what years of being aware of the damage and desparaging remarks annonymous entities have done to both people and their dogs on this board.
Regards
Sue b
by Penny on 05 March 2009 - 23:03
by pencil on 06 March 2009 - 00:03
Still none of the BIG 4 kennels have signed the petition for a split-could it be that they all show under General Champ show juges and Crufts have one such judge this year.Just a thought.
I would ask Sue b: but she's like the weather-wet windy and very changeable.
by Videx on 06 March 2009 - 01:03
by missbeeb on 06 March 2009 - 07:03
LOL,David.
Sue, this pencil person reeeealllllly has a bug up their ass about you... did your dog whack theirs in the ring? LOL
First I'd seen or heard of that email, Sue but I guess we shouldn't be surprised... sounds like a "broker" type to me.
by funky munky on 06 March 2009 - 07:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
