Opposites :) or :( ,,,, ? - Page 8

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Shtal

by Shtal on 30 August 2014 - 23:08

Red Sable wrote: If he happens to believe he has evolved from an ape, where as you know you are lovingly made by your creator, you tend to act with moral decency, whereas he reverts to his ape like ways.

 

Red Sable, if our thoughts are the mere by-products of the electrochemical processes in our evolved brains, you would not get "truth" you would get "brain-fizz." Chemicals do not produce "truth" they just react. As Doug Wilson said, it would be like shaking up a can of Mountain Dew, and a can of Dr. Pepper, opening them, and watching them fizz. Neither fizz is "true," they just are. VK4's denying belief in God is not unbelief, but "professed unbelief" - an exercise in self-deception. He may know things, but he cannot account for anything he claim to know. Arguing against God's existence would be on par with arguing against the existence of air, breathing it all the while. He admit that absolute truth exists or at least at one point he did, but he cannot account for it without God. VK4 believes he has all the answers or at least he claim to know things to be true, but cannot justify knowledge or truth according to his own worldview. He uses universal, immaterial, unchanging logic in order to come to rational decisions, but he cannot account for it. Truth, knowledge and logic are not the only ways God has revealed himself to him, but they are sufficient to show the irrationality of his thinking, and expose his guilt for denying Him.

The opposites is very simple, vk4 is on the wrong side of the road...Hi Vk4 :)


by vk4gsd on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

Red Sable, our thoughts are the mere by-products of the electrochemical processes in our evolved brains, when you believe in immaterial, invisible dieties like god and santa-claus you do not get "truth" you  get "brain-fizz." Chemicals do produce "truth" as truth comes from brain-states and brain-states and all our thoughts are just electro-chemical reactions.

 

Doug Wilson is a theologian that sells books to confirm the biases of gullible christians. he also supports slavery;

Wilson's most controversial work is probably his pamphlet Southern Slavery, As It Was,[1] which he wrote along with League of the South co-founder and fellow Christian minister Steve Wilkins. The pamphlet stated that "slavery produced in the South a genuine affection between the races that we believe we can say has never existed in any nation before the War or since." Historians such as Peter H. Wood, Clayborne Carson, and Bancroft Prize winner Ira Berlin condemned the pamphlet's arguments, with Wood calling them as spurious as holocaust denial.[22]

 

he is not a scientist, he is an arts graduate and is unqualified to make any scientific statements, he is so stupid he thinks his own thought processes are the same as  shaking up a can of Mountain Dew, and a can of Dr. Pepper, opening them, and watching them fizz. Neither fizz is "true," they just are. i totally agree with him, doug wilson's thoughts on science are nothing but brain fizz.

 

VK4's denying belief in God is not unbelief, but "professed unbelief" - WTF????

 

his lack of belief stems directly from a complete lack of evidence to support the existence of an invisible, immaterial diety that sits outside space and time, in fact the observable universe exists the same as it would if no god existed, so why make up a god when science is progressing rapidly and explainining all things primitive peopple thought was caused by god eg lightning.

VK's is an exercise in ridding himself of self-deception that the theists suffers from. He know things, and he can account for anything he claims to know by appealing to the evidence that supports what he knows, unlike the theist who has no evidence.

Arguing against God's existence would be on par with arguing against the existence of Harry Potter and Santa Claus, while watching Harry potter movies and getting christmass presents all the while.

 

He admit that absolute truth exists like when he says there is an X-box in the room anyone can check and verify wether the statement is true or not in an absolute sense and at all  point he does, and he can account for it without God.

 

Shtal beleives that VK4 believes he has all the answers or at least Shtal claims to know things and claims his beliefs to be true, but cannot provide a single scrap of evidence to support his beliefs or  justify knowledge or truth according to his own irrational worldview.

 

Shtal uses his own, immaterial, unchanging lack of logic in order to come to irrational decisions, and  he cannot account for it. Truth, knowledge and logic are not the ways God has revealed himself to him, because god only exists in shtal's imagination and they are sufficient to show the irrationality of his thinking, and expose his guilt of being completly irrational.

The opposites is very simple, Shtal is on the wrong side of the road...Hi Shtal :)


Mountain Lion

by Mountain Lion on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

More Rum & Butts please...


by vk4gsd on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

ML, i had you figured for a butt muncher, not judging you.


Mountain Lion

by Mountain Lion on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

I had you figured for writing religious greeting cards for hallmark...


by vk4gsd on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

glad you appreciatte my work, anything that can help people lose the hate and fear based god delsuion would be a good contribution.


Shtal

by Shtal on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

LOL @VK4


Mountain Lion

by Mountain Lion on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

Must be too dark to chase Betsy around the pasture, so you (VK4) jumped on the computer...


Shtal

by Shtal on 31 August 2014 - 00:08

VK4, you need to see a doctor....that's for sure LOL


by vk4gsd on 31 August 2014 - 01:08

Shtal you need to read the stupidity in your own posts and stop trying to bait me with immature unsubstantiated comments, thats ML's only purpose here evidently.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top