Just a question - Page 8

Gouda,

Lol, I had my funny bone hat misplaced!  Thanks for helping me find it again! That is funny!

I hope you share pictures as he grows, your special pup! Glad he will be yours to love!

Gouda,

I just went to your site and took another look at the little heartbreaker! That Dillinger is awesome! No wonder you would never let him go!  And you do know I do worry about your health. I know your wife is surely making sure you do as doctor has ordered, but there is no way it has not been a tough ride.

Any way, if at whatever age or time you might worry about who or where will be the best home to care for Dillinger, please keep me in mind at the top of your list. You can be sure I would personally go to pick him up, or fly, if it is just too far. But it would be me. Just an option for you. I admit he just stole my heart. 

Bee
 

bee....awww...thats is so sweet of you...see people here it is...the proof...bee has the biggest heart on here...

Gouda wrote: By the way is Creation a tainted gospel?

The answer is no Gouda, the Bible is scientifically accurate.



Gouda wrote: To say that a living replicating cell arose without design nfrom non living matter is the we akest point of a evolutionist.
It is so weak thay many famous scientist who have worked for years to find a plausible ti
might have happened have concluded that life evolved somewhere in space where conditions are different
from those on earth,because it evidently coul not happen here.


I want to extrapolate this subject for you in little bit more details my dear Gouda: First, I would like to start and if we look why evolutionists: why won’t they say example that life could have evolved on the Moon? Well we know that of course the moon does not have atmosphere it does not have any water or anything else but at the same time I think that is the good question because according to evolutionist paradigm this planet earth began as a red hot ball of stone, (red hot) no atmosphere, no water, nothing, just red hot after it was first form. And evolutionist left with uncomfortable position having to suggest or at least state full out that every living creature from that little amoeba to the huge blue whale came ultimately from red hot ball of stone at the sterile, no water, no atmosphere. And I don’t have that kind of faith - example like VK4 on this forum; just to see all of it incredible diversity of life coming from a red hot ball of rock 4.6 billion years ago.  It is amazing and it is very strange ideas that evolutionist have where life came from, some even say these days it may come from Mars. I think this is fascinating because now evolutionists intellectually honest they are saying the way that earth is setup, there is no way that life could have evolved here on earth, and so they removed the problem; I mean this is the real problem for evolutionist and they put it on Mars. But they still have a problem trying to explain the origin of life and now they compound the problem by saying it’s somehow evolved on Mars, came to Earth and now that Mars is without any kind of life and here we are. And btw Gouda, earth has 73 percent of water on the surface. And the evil twin of earth is Venus. Venus has no water and yet if evolutionists are right and Earth got all of its water from these cosmic water balloons, comets containing water, why does Venus has the same amount of water? It has same rotation, the same orbit characteristics and all, and yet we couldn’t have two more different planets and so and that’s where evolutionists laugh at the idea worldwide flood but then they look at Mars that has no water and they say boy sure looks like there was incredible flooding there lol. They are standing on the planet 73 percent water and they saying you have to be unscientific to think there was a worldwide flood. And so this is kind of strange situation we find are selves my dear Gouda. And so how do we know as Christians God made Adam and Eve in the beginning and how do we know that the Bible speaks of young earth. (Luke Chapter 1 verse 70 and Acts chapter 3 verses 20 -21) Basically what we found is that the apostle Paul and also in the first chapter of Luke we find that they state God created the world and God’s prophets at virtually the same time and that there is all sorts of words in scriptures that can define (describe) vast periods of time; if God in his infinite wisdom wanted us to understand that he created the world and billions years later created man he would had says so in those two verses.  (Luke Chapter 1 verse 70) As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: And (Acts Chapter 3 verse 20-21) And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. And So God is not the author of confusion; if he wanted us to understand that he created the world and billions of years created man he would have said so in those two verses to make it crystal clear that we live in a very old earth that separates man and creation world by billions of years but he didn’t, he wants us to understand because he loves us and he is not the author of confusion; he created this world and people at virtually at the same time. One last thing; if you have any questions for me Gouda please let me know. And btw when you said to Carlin If I want crap from you,I'll sqeeze your head. In my book of judgment that is unbiblical.


Shtal.
 

There is NO evidence that life 'could not happen here' on Earth;
there is every reason to believe that it DID occur here on Earth
(even if this planet is the only one with sentient life, which is 
still debatable) PRECISELY for the reasons Shtal points out
that the Moon would be UNsuitable:  no atmosphere or water.

REAL proof of an Unmoved Mover, for me, would be the 'creation'
of life under just those impossible circumstances.  
So when the astronauts suddenly discover an impossible and so
far totally unnoticed living creature on our Moon, maybe I will be
prepared to stop being an atheist ...

Carlin, what do you think about this video?


Shtal.

shtal,
when you say, god said this and god said that, it is a lie.  God said none of those things, men said those things and claim they got it straight from a god in a vision of course, or a dream if you will.
Thin, very thin......
No where is there a direct quote from any god.

Now this other crap you subscribe to, red hot ball of stone, evil twin, water balloons, Mars.......Where do you get this stuff, these lame videos?
This DNA crap, it is understood less than the universe is understood, and your sources are authors, religious public speakers, and their theories.
Everyone has a theory, and at least one orifice for expelling waste, some people have two.

Yeah gouda's a twisted sick man, we all know this already, you better than others as you both speak a similar language.

Neither of you can comprehend billions of years.

If a god exists, why do we debate it?
This should be your mission in life to understand why.
Not post crap as fact.
Imagine what could be accomplished if we were all on the same page, we have the power, we just don't agree on how to use it.

Moons.

 

Shtal -yes, "junk DNA" is now thought to be an integral functioning part of the human genome.  The entire video seems to be a response to a position forwarded by some evolutionists on the basis of a prior model of "junk DNA". The video is also rather narrow in scope, which is ok, unless of course one would seek to define it as a comprehensive argument for intelligent design.  In fact, it isn't even a comprehensive response to the theory of evolution.  What it does accomplish however, is to illustrate my long-standing point that no sooner do we make some remarkably profound and explanatory discovery, that we end up having to retract, refine, or retool those theories within a relatively short period of time.  In a nutshell, that is the paradigm of science, and it works.  The interesting part of that for me, is on the front end of some sort of earth shattering finding, we seem to either forget or ignore such a reality, with pundits waiting in the wings to utilize said findings to forward an agenda.  Evidently, this holds true for people of all persuasions. 

A narrow scope, more like looking through a pin hole from ten feet back.

Here ya go moons.  The author says he touched on some issues that the 52 minute time constraint of the film did not allow him to touch on.

 

You've mentioned your interest in the Native Americans, so this may also interest you.