The Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by GSDtravels on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

That's right, so how is it you believe what you believe by using adjustable parameters via sciences that give only retrospective suitable observations ?
What the hell are you talking about? Please tell ME what I believe.

Believing just that is a dogmatic mindset and against the very definitions of science and scientific method the observations themselves derive it from. Not only that, but it makes the whole fact vs theory community restricted to interpretation through a biased filter or one sided by peer review that is obviously mainstream.

The reason it's mainsteam is because it has the EVIDENCE!

BabyEagle, the EVIDENCE was presented in court and the EVIDENCE was conclusive! You are way too far gone, there is no hope, I fear. You really need to read the court transcripts and if you still deny the evidence, well....

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

BabyEagle,
sorry if you felt ridiculed.

Moons.

by BabyEagle4U on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

GSDTravels .. you said in the OP that video is the best 3 hours we will ever spend.

I'm assuming you believe that to be true ?

Well, that's what the hell I'm talking about.

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

I wonder if any dogs saw that video, dog dog dog.
LMFAO.
If you mention a dog this will be moved just like the Mark Kelly thread..
Do you think dogs go to heaven ?

I'm at a total loss to find any sense at all in this sort of moderation...

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

I give up..

by BabyEagle4U on 26 March 2013 - 21:03

Moons, what the hell are you talking about ? LOL Tongue Smile

by GSDtravels on 26 March 2013 - 21:03

Me too!

by GSDtravels on 26 March 2013 - 21:03

BabyEagle, let me try to simplify this. There is overwhelming evidence that evolution occurs. There is not one shred of evidence that the universe was created. ALL of the Creationist "science" is bogus, as proven in a court of law, by a Conservative Judge. If you choose to deny evidence, that's your problem, but you cannot push dogma in lieu of science. If you want to believe in a Creator, that's fine too, but teach it in Church and keep it out of the schools. That' gives people a choice of religion, but a foundation of the facts of science. That's not dogmatic, that's scientific.

by BabyEagle4U on 26 March 2013 - 21:03

Unbelievable. What could be a decent conversation always, ALWAYS turns into a circle jerk.

I'd like to know what the heck is being said at you people's funerals.

Better yet forget me - YOU prolly don't want to know !!!

LOL

by Felloffher on 27 March 2013 - 00:03

BE,

We could have a decent conversation/debate on many of the topics you bring up. However, you present these topics in a manner, as if they some how discredit science. You may be better received if the discussion remains on a philosophical level.

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

The Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism - Page 7

Pedigree Database