Any news on the Bartmess case? - Page 7

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

LadyFrost

by LadyFrost on 02 June 2011 - 15:06

Slamdunc...good question, there were few others that did not make it up there....the one with Hans discussing the black puppy.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 02 June 2011 - 15:06

Jim,

I would guess when our abuse button moderator had all these threads deleted, it screwed up the count and it is probably why they do not show up. Ask the abuse button moderator. I know who it was, but I need to be careful I do not make someone think I have a sixth sense or something.

Frosty,

You can deflect all you want. Where did you get this from? "you are sooo good at telling what other people think and why they do what they do" I think you are talking out your a-hole.

Let accounting know to add a few dollars to all bills to make up for you trying to pick men up on a forum all day. Does your husband allow you to have VACATIONS with other men? 

What would the boss say if he seen a log of your internet usage, while you are working?

BTW, are you trying to tell me not to comment on this forum? What about freedumb of speech? lol.

by beetree on 02 June 2011 - 15:06

Sorry, if you feel my opinions are dumb SP.  You are free to write that. Of course, everyone does not walk lock-step to get to where we all need to go. So, you don't need to be so rude about it, yours is not THE ONLY right way to think. 

The fact she is not here is because on this site , MODS BAN PEOPLE.  OLI thinks that is a good thing.  In presenting a possible "side" for Hans, I think of his conversations about living in an oppressed country before coming here. 

Now, I am informed "of the rest of the story", and that includes a possible desire to capitalize on JB's "rare bloodlines". And perhaps not only him. That scenario takes a rather dubious twist in the RIGHT vs. WRONG challenge.  I don't go to his site so I can't say what conversations take place there.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 02 June 2011 - 15:06

Beetree,

Not one word I wrote is directly pointed at you. Understand freedom of speech has nothing to do with this situation. It is not a freedom of speech issue.

Now Frosty that is a different situation.
BTW, Frosty I have forgotten more than you know about these dogs. If and when I go back to talking dogs remains to be seen.

LadyFrost

by LadyFrost on 02 June 2011 - 15:06

SP..it's so nice of you to worry about my business and my personal life (small part edited: because that was just wrong, i would hate to hurt anyones ego..lol)....besides if you would look at the time, it's my lunch time and i spend it how i see fit ... your "attacks" on personal level are just childish due to a lack of anything valid to say ....

but i know your "sick sense " won't let you rest, you simply do not know how to walk away..i bet it drove you crazy when i did not reply to your political views on a president tread...LOL... it's okay some of us just mature later than others...I understand and don't blame you one bit.

well, back to work...I guess i will just have to check in with you when i can and cannot have free time..LOL..
cheers
loves and kisses

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 02 June 2011 - 16:06

This coming from the ex-president of my fan club.

Personal? I think you missed the first people who took it personal. When the 2 you mentioned took it personal with every member here, I guess I could go personal on them. Since you were not a member again you are talking shit, because you were not here for any of it. 

Yeah everyday that you are on here you are on lunch. lol. You eat a lot. lol.

Frosty I just did a quick look at your posts and you eat at all times of the day. Are you diabetic? lol. Keep talking or eating Frosty.

Now back to Janice, even though someone tried like hell to get it off that subject. Right Frosty.

LadyFrost

by LadyFrost on 02 June 2011 - 16:06

you mean back to Hans and your assumption of what he is thinking when he is not replying....sureeeee...go for it ... :)

LOL.

by the way I am <-- still a fan...LOL

Slamdunc

by Slamdunc on 02 June 2011 - 16:06

Well, maybe someone who knows who "the abuse button moderator" is could PM them for me and ask what happened to those threads?  Since, I'm not sure of the individual roles of each mod maybe someone would be so kind to ask?  I'm sure certain mods have read the posts on this topic, maybe they could add their input?

Jim


Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 02 June 2011 - 16:06

When you keep quiet and do not speak out you are condoning what that person did. Like a child molester, people need to speak out and if they do not then they are enabling that person to continue. BTW, an assumption this is not it is proven by a track record. A tendancy to repeat the same behaviors over and over. Like you eating.

If Hans wants a soon to be, twice convicted animal abuser to pass out advice on his forum, I say let him. It keeps her away from here. 

Keeping quiet=enabling.

Jim,

As far as I can tell all those threads are still here. I did a google and yahoo and those threads are number 1. I searched Janice Bartmess.

LadyFrost

by LadyFrost on 02 June 2011 - 16:06

so, by using your argument if i stop posting now, i will enable your compulsive obsessive behavior....ahhh shishhhh...what shall i do...i guess i will have to extend my lunch....too bad i only have salad and a power bar...that wont last me long enough to sufficiently support your cause...I hope you know even if i don't reply I am with still with you in spirit.... kiss





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top