Shtal wrote,
"Bible says: Romans 1:20-22 For the invisible things for him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened; professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. And my conclusion to you Carlin; I stand on God’s word, I don’t take man’s fallible interpretation out-there and how would I fit that with scripture “Bible”, this is the book of history that enables me to have ability to understand the world. We have to remember that we live in a fallen world of the result of our sin; I got to remember that, I can’t take man’s interpretation of nature and interpret scripture; I will take scripture to understand nature out-there. And one last thing there is no evidence for evolution at all, so why on earth would anyone compromise a perfectly good Bible which never been proving wrong with a dumb theory that was never been proving right. (Just leave it alone)…"

Frankly, I didn't get the jet engine part of the post. but the above I did enjoy,,Shtal I have a few questions for you..How is believing in a form of providential/ ordained evolution compromising the Bible?..If God was pleased to allow some things to evolve why is that a problem?..If it pleased God to allow us to explore the world, learn, and understand His creation through science, why do you have a problem with that?..Science can not compromise the Bible,,I prefer to see it as science slowly coming up to speed with what God has known from the foundations of the earth...I say let man explore and think it out,,This too is a gift from God..What else does man have to do on earth for 7,000 some years,,,lol,,,,Rest easy God will have the last word ; not man........

 

LOL

Ques ca c'est guffaw?

I had to look that one up Bee. LOL

Heureux que je pourrais l'humour vous..

This is fun,,I feel fancy!!..
 

Merci beaucoup

How in the hell do you turn a photo shop into a bible study?
Ah, I know, it was Carlin........

The body evolution was no surprise at all, everything, every image we see especially in advertising has been altered.

We've come a long way from the air brush.....LOL

Welcome to the digital age.


 

Ah, I know, it was Carlin........

What !?!  Lol, I did no such thing.  I think the last thing I said was a response to someone's ill-conceived philosophical assertion.  I jumped ship a long time ago; I think there's still room in the raft.

You are blaming this total thread.... FUBAR on whom?  
LOL 

Let me help things out a bit.....

 

Ruger1 wrote: How is believing in a form of providential/ ordained evolution compromising the Bible?..If God was pleased to allow some things to evolve why is that a problem?..If it pleased God to allow us to explore the world, learn, and understand His creation through science, why do you have a problem with that?..Science can not compromise the Bible,,I prefer to see it as science slowly coming up to speed with what God has known from the foundations of the earth...I say let man explore and think it out,,This too is a gift from God..What else does man have to do on earth for 7,000 some years,,,lol,,,,Rest easy God will have the last word ; not man........


The Bible says the animals will bring forth after their kind, but Charlie Darwin comes alone who brought his own twisted ideas; you see the dog and the wolf are the same kind of animal but they are different species, he “Charlie” fooled everybody by changing the words from kind to species.  You see what happened was Darwinism added second definition to what the Bible suggests variations within kinds” which is now called Micro-evolution. And so Micro-Evolution this changes within the kinds, now that one happens, I will go alone with that. I think animals can produce variety offspring; you know long hair, short hair, long legged, and short legged. That happens. And so evolutionist took this foundation of micro-evolution and tried to convince people that macro-evolution is the same thing; and this is where I have the problem with because it is purely religious, it’s NOT science, we never observed any of those changing from one kind of animal into another. Evolutionists all they give is example of Micro-evolution which there is no argument about it happens. But then they imply that is somehow magically evidence for Macro-evolution.
Romans (5:12) tells us by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; death reign from Adam to Moses. (1 Cor. 15:21-22) by man came death; the Bible is very clear, but if evolution is true then you now have death before sin, clear heresy. Now the question is did man bring death into the world like the Bible says or did death bring man into the world like evolution says. If you analyze evolution in depth it is actually religion of death, in order to evolution to work; one animal evolves little better than the rest, what must happen to the rest to make this thing work? They got to die or else new improve gene swamp back into the gene code. You see if someone believes in evolution in its true form then I would imply or comes down to why Jesus Christ died on the cross if death brought man into the world like evolution suggests. I just want people to understand when you have a generation that who start doubt scripture and the doubt leads to unbelief, that’s what Christians are losing, we are losing the next generation, why? I suggest that’s because God’s people are not taking the stand as they should from the God’s word. My point is this but some might say it is okay to disagree what book of Genesis plainly says. And the reason some people disagreeing on Genesis, we are not arguing what’s here, what we are really saying we have to have a Big Bang, billions of years and so on and we have to somehow fit or compromise the scriptures, it’s really taking outside ideas and adding into scriptures. I will still say that the issue is the word of God, you won’t know who God is without his word, you don’t know the gospel without his word and my point is and I will keep saying this you have generations that told you, can doubt this word and it doesn’t really mean what it says in certain areas of the Bible, then did God really say, then they doubt the risk. And the gospel is based in real history and it is the history in Genesis 1 to 11 and if that’s the history is not true, how you can trust Gospel based on that history and to me that is the issue, I stand on God’s word, I don’t take man’s fallible interpretation out-there and how would I fit that with scripture, this is the book of history that enables me to have ability to understand the world. We have to remember that we live in a fallen world of the result of our sin; I got to remember that, I can’t take man’s interpretation of nature and interpret scripture; I will take scripture to understand nature out-there.

bee, i just think you should lay off the models a bit, is it their fault that with the gifts god and photoshop gave them that they are desired to look at. you ask who decides, thats obvious - the free market does.

shtal your boredom is a symptom, i invited you to think just a little, due to yr mental weakness yr brain fatigued, you never answer questions, you insert/cut & paste baseless claims by known frauds. when people challenge this you only come back with funny little faces then disappear only to insert exactly the same stuff back up again and again and again, didn't convince anyone the first 5000 times, so why do you think the exact same content would would make any more impact by repeating it ad nauseam. i know repetition of illogical mantras and fear is how religion perpetuates itself by targeting children, some escape it and think for themselves.