The Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism - Page 6

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 19:03

LOL.... travels...
I didn't want to bring the Thunderbird thing up cause hey, ya never know.
 

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 19:03

You guys who like those thumbs up or down....lol
Just another data collection device.

Hundmutter

by Hundmutter on 26 March 2013 - 19:03

Yes Moons, 'course it is;  but those of us who asked
for it may as well use it.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 19:03

Take that !!   LOL

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 19:03

Ouch! ya got me!

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

* "The thing you and many others don't understand about science is, it's got no opinion on the existence of something it can't test" *

That's right, so how is it you believe what you believe by using adjustable parameters via sciences that give only retrospective suitable observations ? Believing just that is a dogmatic mindset and against the very definitions of science and scientific method the observations themselves derive it from. Not only that, but it makes the whole fact vs theory community restricted to interpretation through a biased filter or one sided by peer review that is obviously mainstream.

Yes, it should be neutral ground .. but it's not. You yourself on a previous thread sited court cases to the contrary or to support the very dogma mindset I mentioned above. There is nothing neutral about this debate .. the neutrality has been taken away from true science and scientific method and observations of theory vs fact by its community and peers. Until neutrality is restored the entire history of the universe and life so magical will never be fully understood. It's almost like a conspiracy in it's self.

Not only that .. but look at the comments made on this very thread. It's like clowns to the left jokers to the right. It breeds hate and disgust to even an opinion there could be a creator or intelligent design. It doesn't even have to be devine .. it could be aliens, et's or even someone in a cave .. but the bottom line is .. anyone who thinks differently is ridiculed to the very point of redefining the definition of science, theory, fact and observations just to prove their side of the arguement. 

Just saying.

 

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

(* "The thing you and many others don't understand about science is, it's got no opinion on the existence of something it can't test" *)

LMAO.... sorry BabyEagle.
No,
Your right, science has no opinion.
 

GSDtravels

by GSDtravels on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

Moons, I just posted the puppy pics on the main forum :)

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

Cute !!
 

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 26 March 2013 - 20:03

BeeTree - I'm surprised you have those two books !!! They are good books ..

Christopher was just at the book store over the weekend and came home with Jeff Hirsch's book The Eleventh Plague !! 

Gezzzuz he's growing up he's picking his own books to read !!  I'm getting old. Confused Smile





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top