BBC The Story of Jesus (Documentary) - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

gouda

by gouda on 16 August 2013 - 16:08

Beetree  There are no upper limits,GOD IS NOT A RESPECTOR OF PERSONS,  SOME MEN JUST HAVE MORE GUTS THEN OTHERS.
THE PRIDEFUL SEEK FRIEND HERE,Im not here to see k out friends.

   gouda
 

gouda

by gouda on 16 August 2013 - 17:08

Carlin

Read the whole chapter of REV.21
IT WILL SHOW YOU WHAT RIGHT LOOKS LIKE.

That my friend is why I preach,not out of pride but for my children and grandchildren,
And all you nuckle heads here.

 Have a wonderful weekend
  gouda
 

by beetree on 16 August 2013 - 18:08

Gouda,

I think you took a wrong turn in Albuquerque! This is an OT forum on a Dog Board. Wondering  I really never considered the war being fought for souls as why I bother to post here. If I make a few friends along the way, I am always delighted about that. Doesn't always work out that way, LOL, for sure, but when it does, it has been great. Teeth Smile

 

vonissk

by vonissk on 16 August 2013 - 20:08

So now I'm a knucklehead, which is the correct spelling. This is why you guys don't recruit very many souls in here, if any. You guys are bad with the name calling--noone wants to be around people like that, much less follow in their footsteps.
Good post Bee.

gouda

by gouda on 16 August 2013 - 21:08

Dont blame it on the name calling,its the written words in the Bible that bothers you.
I;m not a name caller my friend ,the couple of names that I have spoken here,
were mostly intended to be humorous.  Ive been called hundreds of names here,who cares? I dont.
Learn to relax my friend .

  gouda

gouda

by gouda on 16 August 2013 - 21:08

BEETREE    I know  you didnt consider it Beetree,but I did ,I took the turn intentsionly,and never regreted it.
The big bonus of my turn is meeting a wonderful Christian friend like Shtal and Red Sable and a few  others here.

  Someday you will realize what I was all about,hopefully it wont be to late then.

    gouda

by beetree on 16 August 2013 - 22:08

I am on another "plane" so to speak, Gouda. Yours is two dimensional. And RS, and Shtal, from what I understand. I need that third dimension for it all to make sense.

by vk4gsd on 16 August 2013 - 22:08

shtal, gouda, what level of education do you have? i feel like engaging you in a respectful debate but i venture to guess it would not be a level playing field and i am not into ridiculing you for my own gain just because you are so weak, feeble, malicious and deluded.

vonn you mentioned yr christian friend noted down yr questions and will get back with some answers for you. it's great you are seeking knowledge but don't whore out yr being in the process. we all have more to learn from your native heritage than anything you can gain from our corrupted, sick and cheap belief system.

shtal i liked yr old avatar of the big sword weilding avenging angel than yr current one, could you please change it back.

it is a downside of our overly tolerant humanistic secular based moral legal system that the likes of shtal and gouda can walk and speak freely with little fear of what should happen to them. their shrunken heads would make neat ornaments.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 16 August 2013 - 22:08

Carlin,
you don't know what I meant about getting it right?

If there were one supreme being everyone would know it by the same name, and they would know it directly, personally, not by the words of others in books that have changed down through the ages.
Not through a guide or interpreter.

The books would all be the same without conflict or controversy.

gouda,
you really do need a pulpit of your own cause this just ain't workin for ya.
It's not my fault if no one near you, who actually knows you, wants to listen to it either.



Moons.





 

Carlin

by Carlin on 16 August 2013 - 23:08

I understood moons.  When I said what I did, it was within a train of thought.  I wondered why, and took it the next logical set of questions.  When I said I didn't know what "right" looked like, it was after I had wondered how it would be possible to have freedom without consequence, love without choice.  The "don't know", stems from the fact that I am not able to comprehend the answer to the moral question raised why a "god" would create things in such a way, with the forethought of the calamitous consequences to a supposedly beloved creation.  My Christian existentialist faith doesn't find me in a place where I need to have all those answers.  With that in mind, I have never questioned any rational argument against faith. 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top