body EVOLUTION?.. - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by beetree on 01 November 2013 - 14:11

LOL, you thought I was serious!Tongue Smile

by beetree on 02 November 2013 - 12:11

Ruger1:
Wait a second....Edward Cullen? LOL .... It just hit me! Yes, please if you would be so kind, leave Jacob intact for me, too! Wink Smile 

 

by desert dog on 02 November 2013 - 14:11

I personally liked her better after. But then again I like Cindy Lauper and Kate Beckensale.
hank

 

by joanro on 02 November 2013 - 14:11

Carlin, Aynn Rand is obviously your moral compass. That's good, but maybe you could go off her dialogue a tad?

Carlin

by Carlin on 02 November 2013 - 14:11

There may be some merit there, but in this forum per say, the scope of the entire picture is limited by a lot of factors.  The atheists would offer that my supernatural ontology is irrational, and I would agree.  In fact, I would be much more inclined to align myself with Kierkegaard than Rand. Particular outlook aside, she's somewhat pedestrian, IMO.  Much can be had if you read between the lines; all is not what it seems.

Ruger1

by Ruger1 on 02 November 2013 - 16:11

Hank,,I agree!..If I had to choose now which I would like to look like it would definably be the final result!!..Why not, I always hoped to grow up looking like my Barbie !!..I sure wouldn't pass up the opportunity,,:)

 

by beetree on 02 November 2013 - 17:11

LOL, Do you know what you are saying? Do you know what Barbie's proportions would look like in RL?

If Barbie was a real woman she'd be forced to walk on all fours and would be physically incapable of lifting her over-sized head - perhaps a far cry from what the designers of Mattel envisioned.

A disturbing chart that converts the doll's body scale into a real-life human being's reveals the outrageous proportions that transforms her into something out of a Sci-Fi movie.

Starting from the top down, Barbie's head would be two inches larger than the average American woman's while resting on a neck twice as long and six inches thinner. 
 

From these measurements she'd be entirely incapable of lifting her head.

Her 16-inch waist would also be four inches thinner than her head, leaving room for only half a liver and a few inches of intestine.

Like her fragile 3.5 inch wrists, her 6-inch ankles would prevent her from heavy lifting. Then, as far as holding up her entire body - despite so much of it missing - it'd be an entirely impossible feat requiring her to walk on all fours.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2308658/How-Barbies-body-size-look-real-life-Walking-fours-missing-half-liver-inches-intestine.html#ixzz2jWMSiF7B 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Ruger1

by Ruger1 on 02 November 2013 - 17:11

Walking is not necessary Bee,,And I wouldn't worry myself about picking things up either!!,,All those slobbering men would be there to help lil ole me!!,,I would lay around smiling , giggling and just being beautiful!,,,;)   lol,,,

by beetree on 02 November 2013 - 18:11

LOL@ Walking not necessary! I think you won't have to worry your silly, little head, too much about it! :))  Your glamour shot was very well received and there was plenty of slobbery going on as far as I could tell!
Wink Smile

Shtal

by Shtal on 02 November 2013 - 18:11

Carlin, I disagree with your last post, I am busy now; later tonight I will explain why?





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top