This is a placeholder text
Group text
by BabyEagle4U on 06 June 2013 - 22:06
Why is it always us Americans that bust government corruption and BS wide open then look like a crazy or conspiratorial jackarse ? WTF !!!
Some of you people need to start sungazing the first hour of sunup and before sundown. Solar charge your body for once. Ohh wait, that's a conspiracy too !!
Some of you people need to start sungazing the first hour of sunup and before sundown. Solar charge your body for once. Ohh wait, that's a conspiracy too !!
by Two Moons on 07 June 2013 - 00:06
Solar power up huh?
LOL........... O K
LOL........... O K
by Hundmutter on 07 June 2013 - 04:06
Moons, you might find it easy to see but I'm afraid I don't;
most accusations around such one-world government
plotting turn out to be thinly veiled exercises in anti-Semitism.
There are rich & powerful people in all nations; some are
undoubtedly in cahoots with some others - but I bet that
isn't a static thing, it changes with politics n prices. Hence
we see a rise in Chinese influences currently. My experience
of human nature tells me that there are too many differences
of opinion among these to result in one long term concerted
agreement to e.g. kill off a certain amount of the Earth's
population; for a start, WHERE to start this cull ? These
shadow figures may all be motivated by the same thing -
profit - but they doubtless have more than one thought on how
best to achieve it. Un-Minuted Talk-shops do not necessarily
result in unanimous decision-making ...
BE & co's American Paranoia is open to ridicule because it
postulates a scenario that, while it might well operate to the
advantage of SOME of the 'rich', would equally not work in the
interests of others. Certainly none of its ever going to be in the
real interests of ordinary people, but there are an awful lot of
trade-offs and contradictions to consider in the broader picture;
and as you Moons are so fond of pointing out, a lot of what is
going to happen to this planet & its contents is now way beyond
anyone's control.
PS I'm out in the sunshine quite a lot, thanks; when we've got
some, that is - LOL.
most accusations around such one-world government
plotting turn out to be thinly veiled exercises in anti-Semitism.
There are rich & powerful people in all nations; some are
undoubtedly in cahoots with some others - but I bet that
isn't a static thing, it changes with politics n prices. Hence
we see a rise in Chinese influences currently. My experience
of human nature tells me that there are too many differences
of opinion among these to result in one long term concerted
agreement to e.g. kill off a certain amount of the Earth's
population; for a start, WHERE to start this cull ? These
shadow figures may all be motivated by the same thing -
profit - but they doubtless have more than one thought on how
best to achieve it. Un-Minuted Talk-shops do not necessarily
result in unanimous decision-making ...
BE & co's American Paranoia is open to ridicule because it
postulates a scenario that, while it might well operate to the
advantage of SOME of the 'rich', would equally not work in the
interests of others. Certainly none of its ever going to be in the
real interests of ordinary people, but there are an awful lot of
trade-offs and contradictions to consider in the broader picture;
and as you Moons are so fond of pointing out, a lot of what is
going to happen to this planet & its contents is now way beyond
anyone's control.
PS I'm out in the sunshine quite a lot, thanks; when we've got
some, that is - LOL.
by BabyEagle4U on 07 June 2013 - 09:06
Evidently you have some Co's over there - and in Parliament. lol
by Red Sable on 07 June 2013 - 11:06
He did a great job of expressing many peoples feelings and getting to the heart of the matter 
by Hundmutter on 07 June 2013 - 12:06
After I wrote initially that the only person I'd heard going on
about Bilderberg was Alex James, (and guess who is interviewing
in this vid), the UKIP suddenly started stirring about it, for the first
time.
UKIP are basically right wing nutters who jump on any bandwagon
that gets them air time - they do not have any real powers of
analysis and their current (slight) rise in electoral successes
is a blip, indicative of the usual increase in (some of) the electorate
grasping at straws in a difficult political environment. The
fact that this guy can say "Capitalism is government in a
fair and free market" indicates his / UKIPs lack of economic analysis
IMO. Of course he is correct, RS, in saying 'the people'
want and need a fair & democratic system, and are aware that
"politics is not being run for their benefit"; but that's a cliche
we could all parrot, as old as politics itself. It doesn't have much
specific to do with Bilderberg meetings, does it ?
about Bilderberg was Alex James, (and guess who is interviewing
in this vid), the UKIP suddenly started stirring about it, for the first
time.
UKIP are basically right wing nutters who jump on any bandwagon
that gets them air time - they do not have any real powers of
analysis and their current (slight) rise in electoral successes
is a blip, indicative of the usual increase in (some of) the electorate
grasping at straws in a difficult political environment. The
fact that this guy can say "Capitalism is government in a
fair and free market" indicates his / UKIPs lack of economic analysis
IMO. Of course he is correct, RS, in saying 'the people'
want and need a fair & democratic system, and are aware that
"politics is not being run for their benefit"; but that's a cliche
we could all parrot, as old as politics itself. It doesn't have much
specific to do with Bilderberg meetings, does it ?
by BabyEagle4U on 07 June 2013 - 12:06
Your grasping Hundmutter. Nutters huh ... lol
by BabyEagle4U on 07 June 2013 - 12:06
Delegates ? Who are those delegates representing and WHAT election are they voting in ? 
Goldman Sachs picks up the tab for Bilderberg including the Hotel and private security costs. You're talking millions.
According to its UK Charity Commission accounts, the association meets the "considerable costs" of the conference when it is held in the UK, which include hospitality costs and the travel costs of some delegates. Presumably the charity is also covering the massive G4S security contract. Fortunately, the charity receives regular five-figure sums from two kindly supporters of its benevolent aims: Goldman Sachs and BP
Link.
Goldman Sachs picks up the tab for Bilderberg including the Hotel and private security costs. You're talking millions.
According to its UK Charity Commission accounts, the association meets the "considerable costs" of the conference when it is held in the UK, which include hospitality costs and the travel costs of some delegates. Presumably the charity is also covering the massive G4S security contract. Fortunately, the charity receives regular five-figure sums from two kindly supporters of its benevolent aims: Goldman Sachs and BP
Link.
by BabyEagle4U on 07 June 2013 - 12:06
by Hundmutter on 07 June 2013 - 13:06
So sue the hotel for cancelling a registration on someone -
(I think they will find that is NOT illegal, proprietors still have
the right to refuse entry, as with bars etc, apart from provable
'discrimination' cases);
normally 'everyone' on here would be arguing FOR the rights
under a Capitalist system to refuse a bed to someone
you thought had ulterior (read "left wing") motives ...
and my views as a Socialist are taken to task.
And arguing 'For' the rights of rich people to hold a conference,
for that matter !
AND for GS to be able to pay the bill for such a conference if
they want to.
But I'M grasping @ straws ?
BTW the hordes of 1000s who were supposed to turn up
here seem to actually be restricted to a coupla hundred
Police & press.
(I think they will find that is NOT illegal, proprietors still have
the right to refuse entry, as with bars etc, apart from provable
'discrimination' cases);
normally 'everyone' on here would be arguing FOR the rights
under a Capitalist system to refuse a bed to someone
you thought had ulterior (read "left wing") motives ...
and my views as a Socialist are taken to task.
And arguing 'For' the rights of rich people to hold a conference,
for that matter !
AND for GS to be able to pay the bill for such a conference if
they want to.
But I'M grasping @ straws ?
BTW the hordes of 1000s who were supposed to turn up
here seem to actually be restricted to a coupla hundred
Police & press.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top